is it better to take courses with new professors or previous ones
The approach a person takes to their academic path and its influential role on their life depends to a great extent on their goals and objectives in life, in addition to their personality traits and capabilities. While some may argue that it is better to expend less resources on academic advancement, and the only purpose of education is career enhancement, opponents might argue that an individual's academic path can affect virtually every aspect of their life. I agree with the latter, and I believe an education path should be challenging rather than easy. Hence, I would prefer to take courses with new professors every semester. I will demonstrate further as follows.
First, although the familiarity with the special teaching method utilized by a specific professor makes studying easier, new teaching approaches employed by professors might provide numerous different perpectives and new ideas. In a sense, if we try to stay with our currently known resources, in this case professors, we might miss out on essential opportunities that we do not even know about their existence. Moreover, even if the new method of the new proffesor is not favored by students, they are still presented with the challenge of adapting themselves to that unsuitable situation. Hence, there is little to lose and a lot to gain.
Secondly, as today's world is a tremendously competitive environment for people to secure jobs, especially for recently graduated students who have little exprience, they might have to push themselves beyond their limits in order to gain exceptional skills and stand out. In my opinion, university, and overally educational system, provides the best opportunity for young people to expand their horizons and enhance their abilities in a safe learning place. Therefore, more challenges and hardship in the educational pathway of a person may contribute to their future success in their career. By contrast, taking courses taught by the same professor keeps students in their comfort zone, and their minds may get biased to new approaches and notions as they are completely unfamiliar to them.
Conclusively, I believe it is advantageous for students to always take risks and make new choices in their education years, regarding professors or any other subject. My perspective is due to the fact that this might be a great chance for students to learn new material, familiarize with fresh perspectives, challenge themselves, prepare for the future struggles of workplace, and further improve their skills to secure a rewarding job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...enhancement, opponents might argue that an individuals academic path can affect virtually ever...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...es employed by professors might provide numerous different perpectives and new ideas. In a sense, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, as to, in addition, in my opinion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29238329238 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94417182072 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570024570025 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3419994879 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.6 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1333333333 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214294959927 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836066246641 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105145477314 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137234199362 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044330223889 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.