Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
It goes out saying that the ability to simultaneously perform as an individual and together with our colleagues or employees in effective teamwork is key to attaining growth and success. One of the heated debates in this realm is whether the teamwork is indispensable in today’s multidisciplinary world or to work lonely. Although there might be some different perspectives, it is my conviction that the momentous quality in a work environment is the ability to work with others in a team because it is a demand of a job market. I will support this view with arguments in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, working in a team contributes to the inspiration and ideas during each process in the forms of meetings and discussions. In other words, with individuals have diverse perspectives, the sitting and collective brainstorming with team members can be achieved much more extensive scope relative to working on a project alone. As a result, in an effective team environment, the proposed notion of suggesting creative and unique ideas can help in creating optimal solutions, and the whole process of their work becomes more efficient.
Moreover, individuals are not capable of covering complete aspects of a project by themselves, facing a lot of stressful situations. While it is undeniable fact that collaboration is less stressful when more than one person work on a project thanks to the burden of the work is divided among all team members and can be distributed according to their strengths. Therefore, each member experiences less stress for the sake of the fewer responsibility, and sharing responsibility in a group allows them to accomplish a project easily and with high quality. An example that can be cited to shed light on my own view is that during my master thesis preparation, I encountered a problem in fabricating my experimental setup. I could not regulate the rate of water flow inside the principal pipeline due to I was not familiar with some instruments. In addition, I must conduct an analytical analysis concurrently while I had no enough time to perform both of them, and it was conducive to I experienced stress at that time. Thus, I appealed to a Ph.D. student having rich experience to collaborate in my investigation. In this way, I felt less external pressure, performing both analytical and experimental investigations.
In conclusion, depending on different personality traits and working environment, some people have a preference to work in a team, while others prefer to work independently. Based on the aforementioned ideas, in order to complete a sophisticated task, individuals must work together, sharing a part of the whole task. Consequently, they try their best to give creative and better ideas to render an increase in productivity and performance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2362.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1798245614 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32322740908 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532894736842 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8030228539 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.222222222 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263851463781 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075063098775 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072017315155 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168357263448 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369167952555 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.