It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends.
" friends take center stage in people’s lives, especially in education" Tara Westover, Educated, 2018. Are old friends more important or the new ones? Even though some people believe that making new friends is so important rather than keeping old ones, others repudiate the idea. As far as I am concerned, keeping old friends is important than making new friends because not only are they trustworthy but also they can guide people due to their vast experience and recognition. As well as, they have a great role in the the formation of people's behavior. In the following paragraphs, I am inclined to put forth some arguments to bolster my schemes.
First and foremost, on balance, it has been proven that old friends are reliable than new friends. For instance, persons have known their old friends for a long time, and it is so important because the long recognition helps them to be reliable. In the long era, they have passed their truths, as well as, people could consider and test them in various events. Thus, old friends are reliable than new friends.
Another thing is that old friends have great experience in comparison with the new ones. From neuroscience's point of views, recognition or familiarity is the first step to help people. For instance, the familiarity helps people to know each other’s hidden characteristics and as a result, it helps people to behave in an appropriate way. As an illustrated case, the friends' behavior is altering gradually because of the deep-versed in each other characteristics. Thus, in the fix situation, they can help better.
Last but not least, according to the given great statistics from sociologists, during people’s lives, the old friends have a staple role in the formation of people's behavior. For instance, based on this fact that the people often spending their time with their friends, the behavior's changing in not surprising issue. Thus, it seems fair to suggest that old friends play important role in the alternation behavior. Hence, old friends are important than new friends in establishing or amending some behavior.
In conclusion, although some people think that new friends are important than old ones, I disagree with the idea. Old friends play major roles in the formation of the individuals’ behavior, guiding the people, and they are trustworthy than new friends. Admittedly, people should try to keep old priceless friends, as well as increase their status quo relationships with others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... friends are reliable than new friends. Another thing is that old friends have g...
^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... as a result, it helps people to behave in an appropriate way. As an illustrated case, the friends be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'friends'' or 'friend's'?
Suggestion: friends'; friend's
...priate way. As an illustrated case, the friends behavior is altering gradually because ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r status quo relationships with others.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, so, thus, well, another thing, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1391509434 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82981817543 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457547169811 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7713217536 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7391304348 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4347826087 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26086956522 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435464635852 0.236089414692 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166668591858 0.076458572812 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153676542292 0.0737576698707 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279285746022 0.150856017488 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10221947659 0.0645574589148 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.