Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.
Today, many aspects of human life have been revolutionized due to the advent of modern technology. Hence, one can attain success with the help of this technology much easier than in the past. From my point of view, life is both easier and more comfortable in comparison with the past. In what follows, I will elaborate on my view point.
From a social perspective, every human being needs to progress and develop in his personal and social life, which is naturally followed by self-satisfaction, self-confidense and self-respect. It is a technology that can provide a context for achieving these mental desiers. On the other hand, the role of modern innovations become more pressing than ever in today's human lives. For the purpose of illustration, consider the innovation of fast public transportation including metro and fast buses. These are become the backbone of large cities, to the point that evry person require utilizing them to do their daily tasks. It is not only today's world more comfortable but also it is more enjoyable, meaning long-term and short-term goals of human beings are more achiveble, leading to more presurable in the course of time. Therefore, it is essential to use technology in appropriate way to achieve success and peace in life.
On the economic side, one should acquire and apply basic and fundumental skills and abilities to attain economical success at the later stages of life.Today, this is much easier for individuals to start and develop their own businesses and climb the ladder of success than in the past. Moreover, a wide range of companies in the field of commuication, high-tech products and shipping is contribute to a decrease in the rate of unemployment ad poverty in societies, preventig social disorders such as addiction, crime ad poverty. On the other hand, today, economic developed countries provide a context in which indivituals feel a deep sese of relief and relaxation, makig life much happier than past. Therefore, today life is more easier and sensable.
To sum up, I hold the view that today's life is more plesurable to the people suffering from food shortage and sanitation in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...dumental skills and abilities to attain economical success at the later stages of life.Tod...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Today
...cal success at the later stages of life.Today, this is much easier for individuals to...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contributed'.
Suggestion: contributed
...ion, high-tech products and shipping is contribute to a decrease in the rate of unemployme...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 727, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ier than past. Therefore, today life is more easier and sensable. To sum up, I hold the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ble. To sum up, I hold the view that todays life is more plesurable to the people s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od shortage and sanitation in the past.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06741573034 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9430910839 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9109967571 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255563025702 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895409368338 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876119477093 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160285205253 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233064004966 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.