No one can deny the indisputable effects of industries and companies on environment. Most of companies do not care about the detrimental consequences of their acts, and they harm the precious environment. In this regard, some are of the opinion that they should become punished by some fees or taxes, while some are thinking thoroughly inverse. Regarding this controversial issue, I subscribe to the idea that devising some legislative rules enjoy more benefits. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will develope in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, companies will stop harming the environment because paying taxes is not economically efficient for them. If the government obliges establishments to pay significantly high taxes, they would cease producing harmful objects because they should spend most of their profits to pay the fines. I have to admit that my uncle’s experience has profoundly influenced my opinion on this matter. My uncle had a shoe company in Iran. They were using some adherents to stick the parts of the shoes, which were harmful for human breath. Accordingly, government compelled his company to cease using that ingredient by puting some taxes for those adhesives. As a result, they stopped using those glues. Had they not accepted to quit using that material, they would have become bankrupted due to the high taxes.
Secondly, new financial rules legislated by the government establishes a sense of discipline in enterprises. Laws are important to stop societies from doing irritating or formidable habits. Devoting fines for breaking the rules, will enhance the durability of the rules. Consequently, the companies or the establishments pay more attention to do things more accurate and managable, in the way that is not in contrast with the rules. Hence, it paves the way to a harmonious establishment. Drawing an example from a well-known soup company in Iran, the soup company was packing its products with a lot of plastics, which were really redundant. After they got a high fee from government, they started to manage and control their plastic use more than before.
Consequently, In light of the reasons mentioned, it is beneficial for communities and governments to dedicate some penalties for companies in case of causing harm to the environment or living creatures. I feel this way because not only does it forces companies to cease doing things that are not profitable for them, but also it cultivates a sense of discipline in companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the companies') or simply say ''Most companies''.
Suggestion: Most of the companies; Most companies
...ndustries and companies on environment. Most of companies do not care about the detrimental conse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'force'?
Suggestion: force
... feel this way because not only does it forces companies to cease doing things that ar...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'force'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: force
... feel this way because not only does it forces companies to cease doing things that ar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, i feel, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2102.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20297029703 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98920139304 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529702970297 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1777035611 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5454545455 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159386511975 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484845975615 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401254656987 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096003472036 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157334412638 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.