A controversial debate which is raised about the role of modern transportation in our lives. Some people hold the view that modern transportation encourages people to own more cars thus contributes to more road traffics and accidents. However, some others may have an opposing view and feel that modern technology creates environment-friendly vehicles which save our world. From my vantage view, I concur with the later groups and feel that modern transportation has made our world a safer place to live in because of the less emission carbon dioxide into the air.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that modern transportation may save the environment. Most of the previously developed cars were relying on gas as a source of energy to operate. However, with the latest introduction of electric cars, people are able to drive these cars without the need for fuel. Although batteries may not be easy to recycle, These vehicles can save the environment from the green gas effect, a negative consequence. of carbon dixide emission. A vivid example which shed light on what was elaborated above is Tesla cars. In fact, such cars are called "zero emission" cars, which means that they do not release any traces of carbon dioxide into the air. Thus, they keep the environment clean.
The second point which deserves some words here is that modern transportation vehicles do not need fuel to operate. Thus, they can save us money. For instance, a car can be plugged into electricity at night and crosses 400 miles the second day without the need for fuel. if the same fuel car is to cross the same distance, it would need 5 gallons of gas which costs $40. Similarly, A fuel-operated car would need at least $90 to cross another 500 miles. Thus fuel operated cars may cost the owners more money as the fuel become more expensive.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. There is another subtle point to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible study published in the Amecian car magazine Journal. The study shows that governments significantly encourages people to operate electric cars because of two reasons. The first reason is the tax cuts which allows people to save money and the second reason is the possibility of driving those cars on pool lanes which are less crowded
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes the importance of modern transportation technology in creating a better place to live. Such technology does not only preserve the environment but also can save us money by saving fuel consumption.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s emission carbon dioxide into the air. The first exquisite point to be mentione...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Of
...een gas effect, a negative consequence. of carbon dixide emission. A vivid example...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to fuel'?
Suggestion: to fuel
...ern transportation vehicles do not need fuel to operate. Thus, they can save us mone...
^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...e second day without the need for fuel. if the same fuel car is to cross the same ...
^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o cross the same distance, it would need 5 gallons of gas which costs 0. Similarl...
^^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e electric cars because of two reasons. The first reason is the tax cuts which allo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, similarly, so, thus, at least, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02027027027 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92815227831 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3922781878 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.875 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162920894475 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419585897559 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749351125908 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106512712955 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107966466831 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.