The only effective way to encourage energy conservation is to increase prices of gasoline and electricity
Nowadays, with the rise of people’s living standard, government attaches greater importance to saving energy as it exerts a positive effect on people’s life. The controversy is surrounding that how to encourage people to conserve energy. Some people are of the point that the only approach is to increase the price of gasoline and electricity in order to strengthen people’s awareness. In my opinion, however, it is not a preferable solution for this problem.
Admittedly, high prices enable people to be more cautions when using consuming energy. However, it will only work on a small portion of people who are tight economically. For the most of the population, like the middle class and the rich, the function of this proposal is limited. There are more effective solutions to save energy other than raising the prices of the gasoline and electricity.
One of the most interesting way, as well as the most popular one, which demands a keen contemplation for government is to promote the clean energy. For the tradition fuel, the amount of it is restricted which means it will be used up sooner or later. However, clean energy and regenerable energy are abundant. In order to encourage people to use this type of energy, the government ought to offer subsidies to the people who are willing to use them and the company which are developing and researching on the clean energy. For example, Tesla is a very company which create vehicles that use electricity as the fuel, setting up an excellent model for utilizing regenerable resource. Moreover, besides rewarding for people who make efforts, government can also punish the factories and individuals who emit the exhausted air resulting from using traditional fuel. This can also raise people’s awareness of using clean fuels.
Another noteworthy solution of the ongoing discussion which needs to mention here is that government should strengthen people’s awareness of energy protection. Part of the reason why people waste so much energy is that they are clueless about how urgent is it to save them and they also doubt about the power of individual’s effort. Government can utilize the social media to disseminate the idea of making efforts to save energy from now on, because it will benefit for their offspring. They ought to remind people that individual’s effort matters by showing them the exact number that how much resources and trees they can save just by taking buses two days a week or turn off the light immediately when they finish. Consequently, people will form the habit to not waste resources and cherishing every energy, forming a virtuous circle.
From what has been discussed, raising the price is not the only solution to save energy, because promoting clean energy and strengthening citizen’s awareness are more advantageous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...referable solution for this problem. Admittedly, high prices enable people to...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rices of the gasoline and electricity. One of the most interesting way, as well...
^^^
Line 7, column 607, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... showing them the exact number that how much resources and trees they can save just ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, for example, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2395.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20652173913 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95329987492 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49347826087 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 764.1 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1662919391 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.047619048 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9047619048 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179285383397 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603299718516 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731666230023 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122075898222 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708766321238 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.