There are different methods of learning to understand more about things. A person can learn through reading a book, or might choose to practice an experiment. While others are just convinced of listening to be more knowledgeable. As a far as I am concerned, I prefer to learn by doing things. On hand experience helps to memorize an experiment, and it is the best way to learn from our mistakes.
First, the practical part of doing an experiment is the best way to memorize it. If a student read about an experiment, he will be able to understand it. However, to memorize it is a different story. For instance, I studied pharmacy at the university Cairo, and there were many courses like pharmacology, pharmaceutics, and nuclear pharmacy. Those courses which did not have an experimental lab were the least to stick in our heads because on hand experiments provide people with experience and skills to become professional. Similarly, everybody know that adding a strong acid like hydrogen chloride to a strong base like sodium hydroxide result in the formation of sodium chloride.but, by doing the experiment in the lab, we can analyse how much of the salt was produced.
Secondly, a person cannot learn from his or her mistakes without doing the experiment. Some people claim that reading about an operation is the best way to perform it. However, doctors agree that, hardly can a physician perform an operation without practice. For example, last week, I had a pain in my tooth, and I was reluctant to allow a new graduate student to do a root canal because his skills might not be developed enough to guarantee the success of the operation. Similarly, an electric engineer may connect a circuit with positive and negative cathodes, but without knowing how it really works, he might have an electric shock.
Finally, using our all our senses may help us understand a study material, but may not grant us success. For instance, a student who prepares to have a driving licence may pass the oral exam, but not necessarily pass the behind the wheel exam. surely, an extensive training is required to facilitate success.
In conclusion, from my personal experience, doing things by hand is the best way to learn from our mistakes. Not only it enables us to succeed, but to thrive as well.
- TPO 12: Do you Agree/Disagree.It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing TaskIn the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requirin 81
- Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline. 73
- Is better to solve a problem by using your own experience or ask for assistance from others. 60
- Do you agree with the statement that teachers have had more value in the past than today 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...might choose to practice an experiment. While others are just convinced of listening ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...yse how much of the salt was produced. Secondly, a person cannot learn from his...
^^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Surely
...ssarily pass the behind the wheel exam. surely, an extensive training is required to ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pass the behind the wheel exam. surely, an extensive training is required to fac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86479591837 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83331789344 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52806122449 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7409705762 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8095238095 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23126636022 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776669791883 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954384862453 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131089824431 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115673640818 0.0645574589148 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.