People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past.
Issues concerning the environment are still on the rise. Resident in Beijing have to wear thick masks in winter if they can to hang out because of the severe smog, the water quality of many rivers in the world are not even suitable for fish to live, etc. In the fact of a complex situation, it is very hard for human beings to protect and improve the environment now. Although the differences are increasing with the time passing by, people can still better protect the environment now.
First of all, increasing individuals are aware of the necessity of environmental protection and willing to make a contribution. It is known to all today that we human beings have no right to destruct the nature and also cannot live if there is no good environment. We can find numerous evidence of personal efforts in protecting the environment. Nowadays. people are informed that the use of cars not only exerts excessive burdens on energy preservation but also can causes pollution with the exhaust gas discharged into the air. In this case, they tend to take public transportation instead. in contract, people took private cars as a symbol of wealth and status which they had to use as much as they could in the past. Thus, awareness makes everyone can get involved in environmental protection.
Secondly, more governments shoulder environmental improvement as their responsibility now than in the past. Except for the most powerful countries in the world such as America, Britain, and China, some developing countries also understand the importance of the environment. Some of them learn the Painful experience from developed countries and know that they will lose more if they choose to develop the economy with the sacrifice of the environment. It is very wise and smart for governments to set up rules and laws for the protection of nature and preservation of energy during their process. In this way, people will avoid using the environment to develop as their forerunners did in the past. Thus, the consumption used in today’s development will be lessened.
Finally, thanks to the rapid advancement of technology, the environmental protection conducted by human beings is more efficient. With the discovery of clean and renewable energy, there are a lot of alternative sources for people. Cars and others vehicles can be driven by other energy, like solar energy or electricity, to substitute for fossil fuel. With the help of the scientific rubbish classified system, thousands of tons of recycling materials like paper, plastic, and metal, can be reused. Needless to say, people can save a huge amount of sources which could not be recycled in the past.
In conclusion, owing to the concerns of individuals, the varied laws from governments and the incessant development of technology, the protection of the environment in today owns higher efficiency than in the past. I definitely believe that we can find a way to solve this issue in our era
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...n protecting the environment. Nowadays. people are informed that the use of cars not o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...ens on energy preservation but also can causes pollution with the exhaust gas discharg...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... to take public transportation instead. in contract, people took private cars as a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, except for, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2471.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04285714286 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94332485173 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.52958701 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.958333333 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368944606308 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938921717906 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849126347041 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194638795677 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061224354499 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.