Since the dawn of civilizations, helping others has been an important issue in all societies. Some people may hold the view that people are not interested in helping others as much as they used to be. However, others may take an opposite view and believe that people are willing to help other people more than in the past. From my perspective, the second belief is true. In what follows, I will pinpoint outstanding reasons.
First of all, it is generally agreed that people are more educated than in the past. I firmly believe that education has paramount effects on people’s attitudes, because they study many materials about ethic and helping each other in tough situations in those materials. Professor Breech in Bentley University conducted an experimental research about the relationship between educational level and motivation to help others. He proved that there is a direct relation between these variables. He argued that it depended on people’ social characteristics that had been formed in the schools.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that the technology helps people to join charity organizations easily. For example, some social network applications like Telegram, Instagram, and Viber facilitate forming groups to help people. A prime example from my own experience may shed some light on this point. I have been a member of a voluntary group for 10 years that helps child labor to go to school and being educated. I remember, before smartphones, we got stock to find some people who are interested in helping these children. Today, we have some virtual groups for that goal which have a lot of members, and we gather some interested people instantly. In addition, I think those applications inform people what it is going in the real world and they have become more interested in helping others.
Briefly, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that people have become more avid to help others than in the past. From my perspective, technology and education are some reasons which can improve the level of helping others. So, I highly recommend that the government should consider more ethical materials in educational materials to improve helping culture. In addition, it can improve this culture by promoting NGOs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Since the dawn of civilizations, helping...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I will pinpoint outstanding reasons. First of all, it is generally agreed tha...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'experimental research'.
Suggestion: experimental research
... Breech in Bentley University conducted an experimental research about the relationship between educatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that had been formed in the schools. Another reason which deserves some words...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome more interested in helping others. Briefly, all the aforementioned reasons ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, first, however, may, second, so, for example, i think, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16442048518 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82460751195 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.573002719 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2380952381 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363692884427 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11574885625 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126073927039 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248881496229 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978719523461 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.