People who cannot accept criticism will not succeed working in teams
Currently, due to the fierce competition in society, people attach greater importance to achieving success. When it comes to team working, controversy surrounds whether people should accept criticisms in order to succeed. Some people are of the point that people ought to stick to themselves and not care the external judgements. In my opinion, however, it is advantageous for people to accept criticism in a team due to the following reasons.
One of the interesting aspect of the current discussion which demands a keen contemplation is that critiques equips people with the ability to enhance their abilities. Everyone has their own strengths and weakness. Even though the strengths may be conspicuous to ourselves, people have a hard time realizing their drawbacks once they are immersed in. Having other people who can point out the weakness offers you a great chance to know yourself better. By listening to other people’s opinion, people have the chances to see things from a different perspective, enabling them to think things thoroughly. If their criticisms make sense, it will enable people to promote and upgrade themselves, resulting in a higher possibility to succeed in career. If the criticisms doesn’t make sense, they can still know how other people think which will be beneficial in the future. As you can see, listening to criticisms does no harm to people’s work.
Another noteworthy aspect of the ongoing discussion which needs to reflected is that accepting criticisms expand people’s social network. People always have a good impression who are willing to listen to us. By accepting coworker’s opinion, people can leave a favorable impression on their colleagues, like easy-going, humble, not-stubborn. All these is beneficial for people to maintain a harmonious relationship with their colleagues. Moreover, through the process of exchange ideas and advices, people are able to know more people in their fields who may help them in the future, like some boss in the industry who may offer you new jobs and opportunities. Conversely, supposing that there is a person who never listen to other people’s opinion nor accept criticisms, the development of him would be limited, as he shut down all the opportunities to know people.
Admittedly, sometimes insisting ourselves is one kind of perseverance. However, listening to coworker’s opinion and even criticisms is harmless to one’s development and improvement.
From what have been discussed, accepting criticisms is favorable due to the benefits it generates to people’s capability and social network.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a team due to the following reasons. One of the interesting aspect of the cur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49261083744 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16944067151 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529556650246 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4458572025 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.19047619 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47619047619 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369020326993 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115629303444 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779412006439 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197185681754 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978200516472 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.