Provide additional training in teaching effectively for high school teachers, using
online material that each teacher will study individually.
In recent decades, numerous people put a high value on the teaching method applied by teacher in high schools since it is playing an increasingly important role in human beings' lives. For this reasons are some courses in which teacher can develop their abilities. Personally, I, to a great extent, contend that it would be better that all teachers have access to online materials separately. My reasons are manifold, among which the most conspicuous ones are substantiated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is that reading online materials are much more convenient that attending lectures. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, if one wants to attend a lecture, he should spend much time since it is really time-consuming. For instance, a teacher who decides to participate in a special course has to spend about two hours in order to go and come back, but through online materials such as CDs and videos, they have the chance to listen to the lecture, provided by an expert, at home. Therefore, it is more economical and easier.
The second point comes to my mind is that having online materials have more impact on teachers and can be more applicable. AS a matter fact, listening to online courses, teachers are able to pause, repeat, and record the lecture. On the other hand, teachers enrolling in a course cannot repeat the class again at a later time. Hence, it is crystal clear that the more one watch and listen a class, the more he perceives. For instance, some teachers may miss classes for some reasons such as being sick or being busy, and if they have the sources, they will follow them and keep track of them in the future.
The last but not the least is that people are not able to transfer all information they gain in the class, and teacher are not also an exception. Although it is completely true that they make their attempt to understand as much information as possible, it is implausible that the teachers, who attend the expert's lecture, can comprehensively tell other teachers points. For this reason, the individuals who learn the material from teachers most probably miss some important points.
To sum up, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that providing all teachers with online courses in more advantageous. Not only it contribute to saving a lot of money, but it also would be more effective for teachers, on the grounds that they will have access to them every time they want. Finally, information is not transferred very well, for teachers may forget some of the most significant points. Overall, all educators should possess the chance to access whole materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...portant role in human beings lives. For this reasons are some courses in which teach...
^^^^
Line 9, column 163, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contributes'?
Suggestion: contributes
...urses in more advantageous. Not only it contribute to saving a lot of money, but it also w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the chance to access whole materials.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, really, second, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91428571429 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71498055795 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6243765394 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189665513042 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560764616367 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428610915373 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114371610289 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289468851683 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.