Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Earth has given everything from food to clothes and without the resources that are provided by our "Mother earth" no living beings can survive. Some people believe that earth is being damaged by human activities while some feel our activities make the earth a better place to live. However, I agree that we have greatly damaged the earth through our activities because of the two important reasons.
To begin with, we humans have destroyed the earth's natural beauty. We started using natural resources available from the earth in a great number of quantities and destroying its flora and fauna. For instance, last year in Kerala, India which is my home state Government cut off the forest part approximately of 15km to build a highway to connect Kerala with the nearby state, Tamilnadu. During this process, many trees were cut down reducing the scenic beauty of Kerala, as it is known for its greenery. Another example is of building a bridge on the river of tapi. Although the river is small it's view was soothing and aesthetic many of my friends and I use to visit that place to feel like we were close to nature but on the construction of that bridge the view is diminished and we now feel that the river had lost its beauty.
Second, because of our greediness to earn and make more money we have destroyed the habitats of many other species and that lead to a change in the ecosystem of our surrounding. For example, during the construction of above-mentioned highway so that trade between state can speed up many animals lost their habitat, the unique breed of cows were used to live and produces there because they use to get their food easily. Moreover, the lions living in that forest use to prey on these cows. However, the decline in the population of cows this year also gave a sign in malnutrition cubs of lions because they are not getting food. If the measures are not taken then there will be huge instability in the ecosystem of this area.
In sum, it's the responsibility of every human to save the mother earth so that she continues to give resources for sustainability of human and other animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... and aesthetic many of my friends and I use to visit that place to feel like we wer...
^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...to live and produces there because they use to get their food easily. Moreover, the...
^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...reover, the lions living in that forest use to prey on these cows. However, the dec...
^^^
Line 5, column 630, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ions because they are not getting food. If the measures are not taken then there w...
^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... the ecosystem of this area. In sum, its the responsibility of every human to sa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, while, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72386058981 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58140610307 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533512064343 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8087267537 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.466666667 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258439185492 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928323666649 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127206271395 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170279452198 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118649406846 0.0645574589148 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.