Some people believe that friendships become stronger when friends enjoy good times together. Others believe that friendships become stronger when friends talk about their problems with each other and support each other. Which of these two approaches do you feel is most useful in helping make a friendship stronger? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People may have a lot of thinking about how to make friendship stronger and help to improve the health of the friendship, and usually, the discussions were restricted to supporting each other or just enjoying a good time together. Generally speaking, I really think that for friends who bother with problems in life, communication and supporting each other can be a better way to establish a stronger friendship.I will defend my opinion for three reasons.
Firstly, to think about this question from the aspect of efficiency, supporting each other can save a lot of time in friendship and people can focus on more important things in their friendships and in this way, friendship's strength can be improved. Take me for example, I used to be an intern at an architecture company which was compelling but has a lot of work to do, I always struggled with chaotic things, and then I would not have enough time to go out with my friend Johnson, who worked in the company and had the same trouble as me. Then we decided to help each other with the work, such as promoting our customers to give advice, installing the applications for design use, and helping each other to deal with the material supplier. We help each other and save time, so we have more time to relax and establish stronger relationships due to the support both in life and work. If we just enjoy good times, we will easily crash by a lot of work and eventually have no time to maintain relationships.
In addition to the efficiency in people's daily life, we can understand the importance of solving problems in friendship by talking about personal development. In this fast-changing world, people always need to improve to have a better niche in society. For friends, supporting each other can give them a way to enhance their skills and have a better reaction to the problem they meet because they can exchange ideas and think about the question in different ways, which can inspire people's understanding. On the other hand, even if friends just talk about the problem for a while, they can spark inspiration by talking. Nevertheless, if friends just have fun and forget the pain in their lives, they cannot have a chance to improve themselves and will lack the ability to solve the issue.
Some people will think that friends need to experience a good time and that memorization of them can maintain the strengthening of the friendship, and they do think that solving the problem may reduce the pureness of friendship. I want to refute this opinion that even if friends help each other, they do things in the frame of trust and understanding, there is no functional thinking in friends' support, the helping just comes from the motivation to care about each other, and virtually be great for people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
... way to establish a stronger friendship.I will defend my opinion for three reason...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, then, while, for example, in addition, such as, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 479.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7891440501 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75603054089 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457202505219 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.3190468794 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.857142857 100.406767564 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2142857143 20.6045352989 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.45110844103 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358984398489 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145716912689 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740413130387 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264818770447 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544331088311 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 11.7677419355 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.