Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs Which option do you prefer Use specific reasons and exam

Over the past few decades, the government has been experiencing many challenges to keep the environment clean and safe for human beings. The government is expected to manage the country’s valuable budget on a crucial matter. Some think that the government should consume that money on environmental problems because environmental issues are big and dangerous for people. However, others may hold a different opinion that it is better to spend money on artistic programs for the country's betterment. From my perspective, the formal view carries more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.

To begin with, environmental problems are a major urgent concern than the art issue. While we are living in a country where the artwork is underfunded, the environment is a matter of life and death for many people. Nowadays, the consequences of environmental degradation not only hit the surroundings but causes the most deleterious effect on mankind. My own city is a compelling example of this. I live in Delhi, which is the capital city of my country. Unfortunately, people in the city are facing many health problems like respiratory issues and lung diseases due to the air pollution that is at peak level currently. The government could not solve these problems as the government has no high-tech machines available that can help to reduce city pollution. Thus, if the government will invest the nation’s treasure to evolve such high-tech machinery systems then it could save many lives in the future.

Furthermore, environmental problems are not only affecting human life, but it is beyond that. It produces the worst effect on nature and the living organisms who are crucially dependent on nature for their food resources as well as for their habitation. To illustrate this more, I have read in the newspaper that many wild animals and birds have become extinct in the last few decades as their natural habitats either were destroyed or got polluted by human activities for their own profit. In this case, if the government will invest money to build more ideal habitats and wild centuries for their living purpose, the lives of these animals will be saved.

Admittedly, the art programs are equally important for the social growth of the country. It is possible for the artistic and cultural programs to be privately funded. Many businesses and individuals are willing to fund art programs in exchange for promotional considerations. Not only that, but the social networking websites also have made it possible for the artists to get a fund provided by private owners in terms of appreciation of their artwork. For instance, there is a community theatre group in my town that recently lost a significant portion of its funding from the government. While this situation looked horrible at a first glance, the institute group was able to attract the fundraisers from the internet who wanted to have their logo displayed in the theatre. This method demonstrates that artists can collect funding from private owners in times of economic difficulties. In contrast, the amount of money needed to solve the environmental issues can not be acquired using such methods.

All in all, I strongly believe that the government should fund environmental programs rather than arts. I feel this way because it could save the life of mankind as well as the living organisms and because the arts can often be privately funded.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, i feel, in contrast, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2894.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 564.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13120567376 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87326216964 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86576605109 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501773049645 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 900.0 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6957243507 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.357142857 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229670902532 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600704221015 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611655401461 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129346756975 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801562744229 0.0645574589148 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.