Traveling to outer spaces and its mystique essence has been what the human beings have been desiring for many centuries and it has been contemplated to be done for years. Eventually, the outstanding progress of science and sophisticated inventions has provided the possibilities for this unattainable dream. The paramount role of accessing to other planets has brought up many debated among the scientist and the governors whether the countries budgets should be allocated for this aim or the basic needs of civilians. Admittedly, I believe the people's basic necessities' in the world should urge the governments to consider them as the first priority. The following statements will elaborate the main reasons for my opinion.
First I want to clarify why scientists have considered about the magnitude of traveling to other planets and take it as a must. No one can cast the shadow of the upcoming privileges which the traveling to other spaces can elicit for the human being's convenience. For instance, the depletion of the underground water and the global warming and their consequences might compel us to consider more about the traveling outer spaces for exploiting their natural resources. As an illustration, the scholars recently acclaimed that our next generations will be endangered from the scarcity of drinking water. Besides, many natural resources will become dry as a consequence of Global warming and as a result, their habitat will wipe out. Thus, we need to take into the account other planets' sources as an alternative. However, I ponder the catastrophic consequences of not providing people's basic demands are more dangerous for next generation versus the critical situation of not having enough water.
On the other hand, the human's fundamental needs have not been given yet and there is profound lack of essentials in many societies. For instance, there are many children in central Africa who still suffer from starvation and many of them have died just because of not having sufficient food. Besides, there are many countries which have been suffering from basic sanitary supplies, congruous health care system, adequate medications, and so forth. In addition, everybody knows that there are many of our children on the earth have no chance to have rudimentary educational opportunities like the safe educational environments and way too basic learning equipment, knowledgeable mentors, etc. As the matter of the face, there are many children in the world are victims of the unpredictable economic system of their governments and have vigorous burdens on their shoulders. In fact, They still need to make money in their childhood just to survive not even think about their dreams.
All in all, all the discussions lead us to the conclusion that main allocation of our governments budget should be designated for the earth's basic desires which are about health care, nutrition, education, our children's safety, and so on. I believe if our governors just take a perfunctory glance at the world's situation will perceive the how far we are from the other planets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ians. Admittedly, I believe the peoples basic necessities in the world should urge the government...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...o other spaces can elicit for the human beings convenience. For instance, the depletio...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 305, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...s just take a perfunctory glance at the worlds situation will perceive the how far we ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 336, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...e at the worlds situation will perceive the how far we are from the other planets.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, so, still, thus, for instance, in addition, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2599.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23991935484 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87915579273 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512096774194 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0793467122 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.95 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279772673739 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807092680697 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477363174551 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17220796518 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578216944802 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.