Some people think governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space (for example, traveling to the Moon and to other planets). Other people disagree and think governments should spend this money for our basic needs on Earth. Which of these two opinions do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
With a rapid advance of technology, traveling to other planets is within the reach of human. However, the cost is tremendous and whether government should spend as much money as possible to support out space exploration is a highly debated topic. From my observations of life, I hold the view that government should spend its budget on other projects rather than exploring out space.
To begin with, authority cares about people, so it should spend money to benefit most people. However, exploring out space does not benefit many people. To illustrate, so far only rich people who can afford the out space trip can take advantage of out-space exploration, whereas most people can only read the news of those rich people traveling to the Moon. Nevertheless, if governments spend money on building public libraries, parks, and reducing air pollution, every citizen can be benefited. That is, since government wants to take care of most people, it is not worthy to spend much money on out space exploration.
Secondly, there are many unmet and urgent needs of people, so government should spend money to solve those problems first. For example, many sick people would die because they cannot afford to buy expansive medicines, and government should help those people get treated. Likewise, many children are too poor to obtain education, and authority can use money to help them. In contrast, there is no urgent need for human to get on the Moon. That is, since we can live happily and healthy without out-space exploration, government should spend money on programs that would make people live better immediately.
Last but not least, government is the leader of the country, so it must find ways to make the economy of country strong. Take Singapore as an example. The leader of Singapore spends much money to support industries by building good facilities for the city, reducing the tax of business, and improving the quality of worker’s life. As a result, hundreds of international enterprises move their headquarters to Singapore, and local people acquire good job opportunities. On the other hand, if they invested money on out-space exploring, their economy would not have been as good as it is now.
In summary, I strong argue that the government should allocate its budget on projects that benefit most civilians and fulfill urgent needs of people. Also, it should use the money to strengthen its economy. Consequently, spending on out-space exploration is not worthwhile.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, while, for example, in contrast, in summary, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13267813268 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75201605281 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498771498771 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0226183877 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4761904762 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414272652385 0.236089414692 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125807763711 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624354249531 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24454437294 0.150856017488 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634777606305 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.