Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
The debate on how governments should spend money on society has been going for decades. Some people claim that governments should spend money on basic needs such as homes and food while opponents state that money should be invested on developing or buying computer technology. Personally, I strongly believe with the statement because technology is being used more frequently every day on education, jobs, and personal life.
First of all, from an educational point, the way society learns skills has changed in the last few years. Nowadays, formal institutions like college and university are not enough. People need to keep studying on their careers after their graduation and computer technology is important for their development. This is because the world changes very fast and professionals need to study after graduation. If governments invest on this field, it will allow better education for students and professionals. In contrast, if the government spend only on basic needs, it will not help the main problem in the long term.
Secondly, the way people work has changed massively. It is generally believe that the majority of the jobs are now computer based. In consequence, governments should spend money on developing computer technology in order to help society to achieve their responsibilities at work. Every school needs to have computers because students need to learn how to use them. For instance, people from other generations who have not had a proper education on how to use computers have had difficulties to use technology in general. My grandmother is a good example because she has never used a computer before and when her company changed processes she did not know how to use the computer so she got fired.
Finally, from a personal perspective, if governments invest on computers, students will be able to learn how to code. I think is important for everyone to have the possibility to learn a computer language. This skill helps you to think in a different way which can help you in life. For example, if students have the opportunity to learn this, they can learn how to organise their tasks, work on a team and it will be easier for them to learn other languages.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the statement that governments should spend money on computer technology. This is because, society keeps learning after university using computers, computers are used on jobs and coding helps you to think in a different way which can be applied to any field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
... has changed massively. It is generally believe that the majority of the jobs are now c...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...language. This skill helps you to think in a different way which can help you in life. For example...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 243, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d on jobs and coding helps you to think in a different way which can be applied to any field.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in general, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06038647343 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83306974158 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471014492754 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8096377305 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7619047619 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95238095238 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343855578026 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104641904099 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989058846243 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219193348688 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112885104173 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.