Some people think that the internet will replace traditional books in the future. Do you believe this would be positive or a negative development?
With the development of high-technology, the Internet has become more important tool in terms of education and study. According to this trend some people are putting forward an idea that the internet will be used to reading e-book in the future instead of classic books. This essay agrees that this change exactly would be positive effect over education system , economy of countries and explain how it will connected these two fields each other.
On the one hand, when we look at economic sides, all countries could much more benefit by using the internet services instead of traditional school books. As we know that each year thousands of trees are being cut down to produce paper because of continuing using books. This loop increases education expenditures of countries while rate of rain forest and green spaces that we will need in the future declines immediately. Denmark for example has been first country who passed law of using the internet as a major study tool in all educational institutes. According to government reports, they made huge profit for using e-book instead of printing school books and this result can be considered perfect example of why we should pay attention to the internet as the most effective item in our schools.
On the other hand, the internet has been seen a wonderful place in which they can find all knowledge about their game, homework, entertainment by all students because, as pupils more interest in the internet, using it at education system may be more advantageous in compared to other materials. A recent research , done by Oxford Education Service , shown that students who are able to using the net and computer are as twice as successful in subject than other students who are unable to using these equipments.
In conclusion, from my perspective of view it would bring more advantages rather than disadvantages and I strongly believe that we’ll see positive results of this trend in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...be positive effect over education system , economy of countries and explain how it...
^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'connect'
Suggestion: connect
...my of countries and explain how it will connected these two fields each other. On the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ed to other materials. A recent research , done by Oxford Education Service , show...
^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...earch , done by Oxford Education Service , shown that students who are able to usi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04615384615 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6912012095 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3305612227 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.090909091 100.406767564 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5454545455 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225094866596 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875482556058 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664334311857 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145336850473 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087254103263 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.