Some people think that it is a good idea to buy a new technological device as soon as it is available. Others think that it is better to wait until many people have bought it. Which do you think is better?
Nowadays, numerous numbers of new technological devices are coming out on a daily basis. A technology once seemed promising become old-fashioned in a few months, and other products take its place. One that satisfies people stays, and one that fails vanishes. In this kind of modern society, is buying a product with ‘new’, ‘high-end’, ‘cutting-edge’ technology a good idea? In my opinion, there is no point of getting a brand-new product with a new technology rather than waiting until many people have tried it. In this essay, I will provide three reasons-making wise consumer decision, saving money, and avoiding possible dangers- to support this opinion.
First of all, by waiting for others to fully use the new technological device, people can make a better decision. These days, a variety of online communities provide consumers with reviews of other consumers. If an individual buy a new product right away, it is impossible for him or her to read different reviews and compare the advantages and shortcomings of the product with other existing products. This can lead to a poor decision.
Secondly, you can save money by having patience over buying a brand-new technological device. It is not uncommon for the new products to lower its price after some time has passed in order to compete with other products coming out following the product. Although waiting until many people have bought the product will not 100% ensure the lowered price, it is true that you are paying the most if you buy the new product right away. According to a research held by Korea university market research lab, cost of a smart phone a month after its release is 70% of that of a smart phone just released. That being said, if you can wait, there is a higher chance of you saving money.
Finally, there is always a possible danger of a newly applied technology. As there are not enough actual consumers who have tried it, there is no guarantee that a new technological device is safe. For example, in 2017, the new Galaxy note 8 was released to global market. The note series, having royal consumers, were sold out in a fast pace. However, it did not take long for people to discover that the Galaxy note has a possibility to explode in a certain circumstances. Imagine if you have bought it as soon as it was available. You could have been the victim of the explosion.
To sum up, it is clear that waiting for other people to buy a newly available device is a better decision than buying it right away, as you can read reviews of others, save money, and avoid possible risks by waiting.
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. 45
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Cars have made a greater impact on society than airplanesUse specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 80
- 4. The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little 32
- 3.The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 79
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 544, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...aiting until many people have tried it. In this essay, I will provide three reason...
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...have been the victim of the explosion. To sum up, it is clear that waiting for...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, kind of, first of all, in my opinion, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84598214286 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92316216328 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508928571429 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8320549636 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3913043478 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4782608696 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30925274089 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885061858403 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734213615617 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175359862424 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021149639542 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.