At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, and students are almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why?
Nowadays, some universities are attended to prepare a circumstance that students will be able to participate in the decisions about themselves, although other universities have opposite opinion about this matter and they would rather utilize experts for making decisions. I adamantly believe that it is better to give this situation to proficient people. that is because of they need to consider all aspects, as well as selecting fitted students that making decisions is hard, and the universities need experienced people for making a decision.
First and foremost, when you want to make a decision, you must consider all aspects of having better results. In other words, students maybe ignore some important subjects in their decision due to their benefits. For example, when I was a student at the university, there was a disagreement among students on when dining hall must be opened in morning. The students that they lived in the dormitory, they had believed that it is better the breakfast distributed in last night of every day, however, students that they live in their home had opposite opinion about this situation; therefore, existing experts for these situations is indispensable.
Moreover, I think that it is difficult for the administration to make the decision about suitable students for these works. In otherwise, you must choose the best students that they can help and make correct decision without bias. For instance, we decided that make newspaper for our university. We informed students for helping in this work. Unfortunately, the students that they were volunteered, they were not suitable for this work; therefore, we were obligated to leave this idea.
Finally, all of us know if you want to decrease the amount of insufficiency in works, you must make a correct decision about them. It does not occur unless the presence of experienced people for deciding. To put it differently, when there are skilled people in work, you can guarantee the consequents of the work. As an example, my brother started for doing a private company with his friends, however, they did not have any experience in this field. Their work was failed after several months due to lack of experience.
As outlined above, it is better to assign experts to solve the problems of universities. That is owing to they consider all aspects, moreover, selecting suitable students is difficult, and making decisions about universities are needed, experienced people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...ve this situation to proficient people. that is because of they need to consider all...
^^^^
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...situation to proficient people. that is because of they need to consider all aspects, as well a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20654911839 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88232979736 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486146095718 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3651424226 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.789473684 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136710773445 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460458109048 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420170886621 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871652089284 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382047867427 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.