Sometimes filmmakers make movies that are based on books.
When a movie is based on a book, some people prefer to read
the book before watching the movie. Other people prefer
to read the book only after they have watched the movie.
Which do you prefer and why?
Without a shadow of a doubt, A great deal of peoples' leisure time is spent on either readings books or watching movies, depending on their hobbies. Nowadays, a myriad of films is directed based on books, and therefore, there are different views on the order of reading the book and watching its movie. I strongly prefer to read a book beforehand watching its film. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, choosing the book in the first step provides the reader with a comprehensive view of the original story in tandem with meticulous details. To put it more simply, since the story was initially set out to become a book, its author has endeavored the best to convey their thought through the writings. As a result, all the episodes are minutely described in the book, with an attempt to depict every particular scene thoroughly in the readers' imagination. On the contrary, films scenarios' based on established books customarily miss some hairline elements and specifications, such as the exact environment an event is happening or the appearance of an actor. Moreover, filmmakers might sometimes discard a point that does not seem to be a critical factor in following the flow of the film, yet, ignoring it brings about great confusion for the spectators. My experience is a compelling example of this. I had read Harry Potters' book series before watching its films, and as soon as I started its movies, I noticed the fact that if anyone first sees the shows, undoubtedly, they will be confused, and a host of questions raised about the links connecting different occasions. It is crystal clear why it is better to read the book first hand and see its movies afterward.
Another reason to be mentioned is that sometimes directors intentionally make trivial changes in the base scenario, which might lead the film to a completely different story than its book. In other words, the movie that is representative of a book does not contain the same scenario and flow, and unless one has read the book before, one will not be able to relate them to each other. Hence, the film is not actually based on a book, and it will so become a source of misunderstanding. Moreover, many of the fans of the books are intrigued to watch the books' film because the books were so appealing to them and if the film is not good or has been changed, the plus point for them is that they have already read the original story. On the other hand, when someone sees the film first and does not enjoy it, they will not become interested in the book either because they think the book is like the film, although they are wrong.
Reflecting upon all reasons mentioned above, I strongly prefer to read a book sooner than I watch its film.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readers'' or 'reader's'?
Suggestion: readers'; reader's
...very particular scene thoroughly in the readers imagination. On the contrary, films sce...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2309.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74127310062 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69340028341 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501026694045 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2461906886 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.277777778 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0555555556 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405105816368 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132066716106 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085033483023 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259237551683 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048884202483 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.