Task2
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A boss or manager should not form close friendship with his/her employees.
Use details and example to support your answer.
Nowadays, companies make efforts to compete with their rivals; hence, the prosperity in this way requires experienced bosses who arrange and manage all tasks. One of the most crucial issues in success of a business or firm is the type of relationship among employees and employers. There is a heated debate in society toward this statement, some people believe that a disciplined boss who maintain a limited distance with his workers is able to achieve his goals as soon as possible, while others have a conviction that creation a logical friendship between an employee and his boss can provide a great number of merits for both of them. Personally, I am unanimous with latter group. The following paragraphs will vastly elucidate my vantage point through some outstanding reasons:
To begin with, nobody could overlook this fact that a serious boss provides a stressful ambient for laborers, since needless to say that workers' performance and firm's profit will be affected negatively due to this circumstance. A psychology group depended on a well-known institution in my town did an experiment in two business company- in one company, there was not gap between boss and employee and in the second company, the condition was vice versa- and an interesting result was acquired. Based on the mentioned research, in the first group, two sides could understand each other better and also workers had a chance to talk with their boss without any fear. The friendly relationship among them caused employees to consult about pressures related to their work with their head; therefore, through eliminating these troubles, laborers could work with a pleasure satisfaction. It goes without saying that a surge of financial successes involved the company.
The second argument for my argument lies the reality that a friendly leader is willing to communicate with members of his organization in out of office atmosphere. One should not forget that such a great association can remove dark and clod clouds from relationship and even the traditional belief about rigid boss and poor workers will be lost in history. In other word, when a boss offers hiking, watching a soccer play or drinking a cup of coffee to his employees, in fact, he establishes a situation without boundary. To elucidate, take a head who goes to hiking with his workers on every weekend, so workers will not only have an opportunity to reveal their real personality in a relaxed atmosphere, but also the leader can take advantage of this position for better knowing of their laborers.
As I have illustrated, this conclusion could be drawn that a friendly relationship between boss and worker, plays a vital role in prosperity of a company. On the one hand, the head will recognize all aspects of his workers and control them easily, one the other hand, laborers will attend in workplace with a sense of peaceful; subsequently, their high performance will increase productivity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires experienced" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'experiencing' or 'to be experienced'.
Suggestion: experiencing; to be experienced
...ce, the prosperity in this way requires experienced bosses who arrange and manage all tasks...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...or laborers, since needless to say that workers performance and firms profit will be af...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, look, second, so, therefore, well, while, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2468.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10973084886 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84588654938 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548654244306 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.2145820555 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.533333333 100.406767564 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2 20.6045352989 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16586575254 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588186592358 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383774248077 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108458522616 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434780287233 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 11.7677419355 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.