It is not uncommon that with the development of society, people's attitudes towards various occupations has changed a lot. Someone argues that teachers were much more respected than they are today. I am an advocate of this idea, and believe that this change is attributed to the change in roles teachers play in education. Although teachers are not as appreciated as they were before, this new relationship offers an new opportunity for a different teacher-student relationship, which is better for modern education.
First and foremost, the change in how the society values teachers actually reflects people's expectation on them. In old days, education system determined that teachers mainly taught student knowledges solely from textbooks, and they were expected to act as supervisors on students at the same time, leading to a relatively high social status of teachers. However, with the swiftly development of education, teachers are more like friends of students now, and their work involves lots of interactions with students like hearing from them and communicating with them. They are supposed to spur sprits and cultivate high moral values in their students. These new requirements of teachers lead to a more equal student-teacher relationship, in which teachers are no longer considered as someone must be highly respected and valued.
This new status of teachers are of vital significance to modern education. In the past, when they were highly appreciated by the whole society, there were likely to be misunderstandings that teachers were always correct and should always be respected. Ordinary people, including parents, could not argue with their kids' children about ways in which their children are educated, for this would be considered as rude to teachers. The high status of educators made it impossible for their fault to be corrected by others, which is absolutely not good for the students. By contrast, in modern societies, teachers are more like other occupations, providing an equal opportunity for both students and parents to communicate with them freely when necessary, creating a much more friendly environment for the growth of children.
In conclusion, it is not deniable that teachers are not highly valued compared to years before, but I firmly believe this aids in the healthy development of students instead acts as a drawback to the modern society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...re before, this new relationship offers an new opportunity for a different teacher...
^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pected to act as supervisors on students at the same time, leading to a relativel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98673740053 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501326259947 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2741555057 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286948224664 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101450292158 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948559469978 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162813477297 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527181802071 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.