Cars are essential parts of our lives these days. Some may not be able to imagine a world without the cars and sure they believe that these machines are great human's product. In my view, they may have had some bad environmental effects on the world but they still have many positive and important roles in our daily lives. I have two main reasons for my claim.
Firstly, the main reason is population growth and desire to have a personal car at the same time. If you just take a look at statistic reports they will tell you that within twenty years we are going to have a population around two times more than what we have now. This is obvious this population will create an increased demand for anything such as food, cloth and of course car. In addition, the car manufacturing line will gradually speed up the rate of producing to be able to answer market's demands. So it is obvious that the more population means more cars.
Secondly, I do not think that environmental considerations would be a preventing factor to produce and have more cars in the future. In contrast, I believe the car market tendency is inclined toward the green technology in which the most of the cars are electrical and solar-powered. Thus in regard to environmental consideration cars even could experience even more advancements so that they can purify the air instead of polluting the air. With this progress, people in twenty years may be more encouraged to buy and support cars
There are even more reasons that someone can come up with to imagine a future with more cars than today. one may say that even with progress in public transportation systems, still, people appeal to personal cars where they feel more comfortable. Another person may say as the cars are going to be considered more and more as an artistic thing and even now there are cars that their owners do not use it but just watch it.
All in all, although some may oppose the plan and say there is not enough room or substructures for having more cars in twenty years, the fact is that most of the people love cars they are there to pay for it. Indeed, not only will the population growth will result an increase in the number of cars but also the technology advances behind the cars manufacturing can reduce our concerns about the environmental considerations and therefore the main barrier for producing more cars is going to be blurred.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...y believe that these machines are great humans product. In my view, they may have had ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I have two main reasons for my claim. Firstly, the main reason is population g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the more population means more cars. Secondly, I do not think that environmen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... cars are electrical and solar-powered. Thus in regard to environmental consideratio...
^^^^
Line 7, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more encouraged to buy and support cars There are even more reasons that someone...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...ine a future with more cars than today. one may say that even with progress in publ...
^^^
Line 10, column 324, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...re going to be considered more and more as an artistic thing and even now there ar...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ners do not use it but just watch it. All in all, although some may oppose the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, in addition, in contrast, of course, such as, in my view, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67058823529 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60168058541 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482352941176 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1954156186 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.764705882 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183404691651 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664272727347 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512045228059 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112647412156 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363558487058 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.