TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Throughout history, the need for the movement to access food and other places leads to the advent of some equipment known as cars which provide a more efficient approach to the transport of human. However, some problems like environmental pollution caused by expanses of cars using oil fuels arise the question whether the rate of the use of cars will be decreased in the future. In my opinion, a concrete answer does not exist.

Nowadays people are increasingly surrounded by technology which makes it hard to predict the future of transportation because technology is highly unpredictable and provides a wide range of solutions for a specific problem like air pollution underlain by fossil fuels of automobiles. For instance, some corporations like Uber have set up high-tech centers pursuing research to build drones and quadrotors are capable to transport people as an air taxi. The necessity of eliminating traffic congestion and air pollution of traditional cars incline scientists to conduct their research on these problems. In TED Talks, the number of invited researcher and scientist who work in this realm has been markedly increased that shows the importance of this issue.

In contrary to the previous approach, some other companies take different strategies into account to overcome transportation problems. For instance, Elon Musk, a prominent entrepreneur and co-founder of Tesla and Space X, strongly believes that Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL) flights are so noisy and also hard in public transportation. Instead, electric cars or hybrid cars, for instance, have been proposed by some companies like Tesla and Hyundai. Furthermore, the emergence of other technologies like Hyperloop, a new modern technology for highly fast transportation via high-tech cars underground proposed by Elon Musk, raises the probability of increasing the production and use of cars in future.

In conclusion, I am inclined to think whether or not the use and production of cars in future will be fewer than today is a highly controversial question because its answer depends on advances in technology and the technology itself is highly unpredictable.

Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
... expanses of cars using oil fuels arise the question whether the rate of the use of cars will be dec...
Line 5, column 697, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...creasing the production and use of cars in future. In conclusion, I am inclined to thi...
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... In conclusion, I am inclined to think whether or not the use and production of cars in futur...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 43.0788530466 26% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39644970414 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08938078907 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568047337278 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.5319254828 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 100.406767564 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102255659935 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392227823164 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500054135688 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812411272945 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566563565418 0.0645574589148 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 11.7677419355 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.