TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

I think being specialist in one specific subject is important than having knowledge of many academic subjects. I explain my opinion in following reasons.
First, in these days, jobs are professional in contradictory with twenty century. It means every job has been defined with a job description that includes specific activities. For example to develop a mobile application a project team will be set. In this team, there are some computer programmers, graphic designers, business analyzers and project managers. So computer programmer does not need to know about graphic or business because there are some people that they are specialist in those fields. In a company nobody regards to unrelated knowledge a person has and experts are paid much more than people with a broad knowledge in many subject.
Second, when a person try to broad his or her knowledge in a vast spectrum, it means this person is not spending enough time on its expertise. So in this case, you are like an extensive sea with shallow depth. When anyone comes near to this sea, he or she will say what an immense sea! But after contacting with this sea and trying to examine some specific part of it, he or she will say oh! I cant swim in this sea. So having knowledge in many subjects instead of specific one looks like a building with a good exterior viewpoint in first glimpse but nothing in interior design.
In conclusion, specialization results efficiency in doing works that it is a valuable factor in our world. You can solve many problems with a shallow knowledge but it is not the best solution. Finally these problems that have been solved with a superficial knowledge will be aggregated with each other and you will face a complex vogue problem.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...ofessional in contradictory with twenty century. It means every job has been defined wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 614, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'broad knowledge'.
Suggestion: broad knowledge
...rts are paid much more than people with a broad knowledge in many subject. Second, when a person...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 635, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun subject seems to be countable; consider using: 'many subjects'.
Suggestion: many subjects
...e than people with a broad knowledge in many subject. Second, when a person try to broad hi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ic part of it, he or she will say oh! I cant swim in this sea. So having knowledge i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...wledge but it is not the best solution. Finally these problems that have been solved wi...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, second, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 297.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84511784512 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69066337945 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0574210653 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9333333333 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252556439799 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864234657394 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086265686038 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171239314631 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675047136095 0.0645574589148 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK

---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.