In the current generation, people are attracted to holly day trips because everybody wanted to feel a variety of experience in their life. Although it is not an ideal for every one some people believe an expert is a considerable character when going for an outing and other not Personally, I believe traveling in a group with an escort is a good decision because he knows the history of that place and safe.
To begin with, whenever I decided to go for an outing, I always try to find a person who is having a better knowledge about that place because I can learn some extra information about that place compare to going alone. For example, when I was studying high school at Omak public school we went to an excursion to the ancient Greek museum in Seattle. when we reached there the tour coordinator requested to the museum official for a guide because no one in the group doesn't know about the history of that sculptures. So, the mentor taught me about every single point about the museum. If we do not have an expert, I don't think so we learn more about the museum and the trip become a disaster.
On the top of that, If we have a well know person in the tour group we can save our time because he knows the exact route map to that particular place so it is easy to reach without any confusion. Here I am exploring my personal experience when I was studying my masters at the University of the Findlay, I and other four of my friends decided to go to the Niagara waterfall and recruit an expert for support. He was really helpful for the trip because all are new to that place so he really advise us to reach that place. if he was not in the group we might choose the wrong direction that leads to the other end of the fall. what more, we could face immigration problems.
In some, when we are going for a trip, tour guide really helpful to explore that place and to save time. Overall, if we have an escort the trip could be more delightful. so, I recommend a tour guide for every tour.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...to the ancient Greek museum in Seattle. when we reached there the tour coordinator r...
^^^^
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...for a guide because no one in the group doesnt know about the history of that sculptur...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 615, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... museum. If we do not have an expert, I dont think so we learn more about the museum...
^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'advises'.
Suggestion: advises
... all are new to that place so he really advise us to reach that place. if he was not i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...e really advise us to reach that place. if he was not in the group we might choose...
^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e really advise us to reach that place. if he was not in the group we might choose...
^^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...hat leads to the other end of the fall. what more, we could face immigration problem...
^^^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...cort the trip could be more delightful. so, I recommend a tour guide for every tou...
^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... recommend a tour guide for every tour.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, really, so, well, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.30585106383 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36519622445 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473404255319 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3980631721 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.933333333 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0505202436365 0.236089414692 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.021276984172 0.076458572812 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.021996699218 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0373914778498 0.150856017488 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0060561623896 0.0645574589148 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.