TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex

There are certain considerations or factors that people can take into account to investigate and examine individual’s opinion. I definitely think that choosing secure job is better that waiting for satisfying one. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. To substantiate my case, the following paragraphs illustrate conspicuous reasons to elaborate my preference.
The first reason is saving time. Nowadays time is more important than satisfactory in many ways. For instance, in many developed countries people tend to save their time by doing some tasks that waste their time less than others. A famous noble winner told that moments are like gold. If you waste your time it means you put gold into trash. Therefore, it is reasonable to choose secure job instead of waiting for job which we like it more.
Furthermore, by selecting secure job you can guarantee your future stability. In fact, when you get secure job as soon as possible you can invest your money in stock market, buy house and other utilities faster than people who are still waiting for fantastic job. For example, when someone get a job a year sooner than his friend he can save money more.
The last but not least, psychological issue is another support. In modern life all folks get stressed in order to achieve their aim through the hard processes. In other words, during the period that youngsters are seeking for satisfying job they may get stressed and feel not good. Additionally, their busy and stressed mind can be harmful for their health. Many psychologists say that individuals shoud take the life easy to have healthy mind and body. Generally speaking, stress can cause some deasieas such as MS, cancer and depression.
Due to aforementioned ground, all folks should bear in mind that getting secure job in more beneficial than waiting for pleased job. Participating of saving time, stability and psychological factor are prime supports.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to secure'
Suggestion: to secure
...inion. I definitely think that choosing secure job is better that waiting for satisfyi...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...winner told that moments are like gold. If you waste your time it means you put go...
^^
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to secure'
Suggestion: to secure
.... Therefore, it is reasonable to choose secure job instead of waiting for job which we...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...antastic job. For example, when someone get a job a year sooner than his friend he ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08411214953 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76724256766 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601246105919 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9265580021 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7142857143 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2857142857 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298561681984 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814684190677 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781481402354 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167456737312 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522306166516 0.0645574589148 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.