Future career has attracted much social concern. A minority of sociologists believe that determining a successful employment path in the past is easier than today. Personally, I bear in mind a strong disagreement with this belief.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is the changing of the world. The fact is that the advancement of the community creates chances for modern technologies to greatly develop in aggregating and storing data in every aspect of life. Therefore, it is possible for many sources of knowledge and information about employment to expand and become more accessible. As a result, people have a tendency to finding a job through computers and the internet and be able to easily obtain various information about employment. Consequently, this plays a crucial role in helping them attain the most suitable choice of their future career. More importantly, it cannot be denied that the development of the world goes along with more connections among people by means of modern devices such as smartphones or computers. It leads to the fact that there is a likelihood for people to have more interaction with other ones and gradually enlarge their social relationships. On that ground, needless to say, they tend to be exposed with varied perspectives about career and, thus, have more opportunities to come up with the most ideal employment for their future. By and large, the enhancement of the societies actually promotes the options for choosing an employment path.
On the other hand, some specialists might say that nowadays there is so much information on employment and people can be overwhelmed. Accordingly, they will succumb in choosing their future career path. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that through their interests, they are bound to attain their own priorities and requirements for their future job. It follows that people are always likely to narrow the information and have everything under control. Furthermore, the development of the world nowadays stands a golden chance for the improvement of education for everyone. In this case, people are inclined to have a wider horizon in any field of their lives and acquire a more thorough understanding of themselves. Correspondingly, it is apparent that they are capable of activating their potential and be more aware of which kind of job they have strengths and interests. Subsequently, it is easier for them to identify the best choice for their future employment. Beyond any doubt, the idea that the advancement of the world greatly makes the decision in future career more difficult is often possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my disagreement. It is highly recommended that everyone should take my writing into careful consideration to have an appropriate decision on choosing a future career.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, kind of, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2438.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19829424307 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02713138845 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507462686567 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4588173149 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.583333333 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5416666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0847586035121 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261069645986 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236177620371 0.0737576698707 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612191774423 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025407173853 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.