TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Without any doubt, teachers play a vital role in social development and improvement. In our education system, the third part of children time is in schools or universities in interaction with teachers. Thus, teaching is a basic foundation for a good society and people in the society feel the result of the education system in all aspect of their daily lives. A question can be raised in this regard is that whether teachers are appreciated enough by society or not. One reoccurring standpoint states that teachers got more attention and were valued more in the past than today. I concur with this idea and in the ensuing lines, I delve into two reasons to substantiate my point.

The first reason is that increasing access to free education and content make people feel teachers are not worth anymore. Technology improvements make it easier for everybody to have an access to free contents such as universities’ courses, home-made stuff and a variety of websites. Therefore, people think they can learn by themselves and there are no more needs of teachers. For example, if I have a problem in one of my courses or assignments, I could figure it out by myself via internet materials and social networks. But it is not true and still society needs teachers to bring up well-educated people who can change the future of society. Maybe the presence of teachers in front of people decreased but the role of them in design and produce learning stuff is undeniable.

Secondly, the quality of teaching diminished in comparison to the past and as a result, people don’t respect teachers like the past. Teachers need other skills such as the ability to speech, body language and psychological knowledge to educate students in addition to just advanced academic knowledge. Because the education system more concentrate on academic knowledge of new teachers, the overall quality of teaching reduced every year. So, students prefer to study by themselves thorough lateral education stuff instead of going to educating classes. There are a lot of my friends who were absent during semesters because of the low quality of teaching but got good grades by studying reference books. Also, teachers usually have another job outside of the university or school and hence, don’t have enough time to take care of students’ problems. So, the bad service people receive from teachers deteriorate the popularity that they had in the past.

In summary, all the aforementioned ideas bring us to the conclusion that the reputation of teachers is less than the past because of the increasing availability of educating content and teachers’ diminishing quality of teaching. Thus, let us hope that teachers take steps and recover their popularity.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...ts make it easier for everybody to have an access to free contents such as universities&a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 767, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to stuff'
Suggestion: to stuff
... of them in design and produce learning stuff is undeniable. Secondly, the quality...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 523, Rule ID: NEED_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'going to educate'?
Suggestion: going to educate
...ough lateral education stuff instead of going to educating classes. There are a lot of my friends ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ake steps and recover their popularity.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, in addition, in summary, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14349775785 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91198898777 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529147982063 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.813078284 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.238095238 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2380952381 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166858972136 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539756327429 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456544049574 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113380464329 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466663096297 0.0645574589148 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.