Nowadays, how to act professionally in the workplace has proven to be a pressing issue. Even though some people think People should correct others mistake in meeting or classroom right away, others do not agree with them; they think we should wait until the end of the session and talk with speaker alone. As far as I am concerned, the latter attitude carries more weight; In that, not only I have more time to think about and judge better the statement of the speakers, but also it is the best way from a psychological perspective. The in-depth discussion on each of the abovementioned reasons is provided below.
The first reason which should be considered here is I would have more time to think about the speaker’s mistake. For instance, I might be wrong too. But if everyone wants to correct speaker’s mistake at the moment, the meeting would not finish with a proper result. Because diversity of people opinion might be so high, especially when people are not from the same group, for instance, work session with customers. Take a personal experience as an example; back in the university, we had a course about art history. So everyone involved in the class meetings. But the problem was due to the involvement of every opinion in the class, we could not our lesson properly. So at the end of the semester, we just finished half of the material in the class because of our long discussion, mostly without good purpose, in the class. Besides that, the speaker might have a different meaning in their speech, and they might correct their statement during the meeting. There was a lot of time when my professor says something during the class, but in the conclusion, they point that this was a mistake and they use that intentionally. So by waiting until the end of session one would have more time to think about the mistake.
One should consider this point from another angle, which is, psychologically, talking alone after the meeting is the best way of correcting others mistake. On the one hand, nobody likes to be ashamed in front of others. So they prefer that one correct their mistake without getting the attention of other people. For instance, one time at my work, in my presentation, I have incorrectly stated a conclusion based on the incorrect statistics. At the end of the meeting, my boss pointed out my mistake when we were alone together. But if he did that during the meeting, I would lose my confidence and made more mistake until the end of my presentation. On the other hand, people have a different personality, so we do not know how they react to criticism. Some people might get offensive, for instance, they cry or give up during the meeting, or they might be defensive, for example, they get angry. So by criticizing other’s mistake we prevent to make the scene in front of others.
In a word, by taking all of the aforementioned reasons into consideration, it is rational to draw the conclusion that one should wait until the end of meeting or classroom to point out the speaker’s mistake alone. It is important to realize that by act professionally, everybody feels safe and comfortable at their workplace or classroom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 22, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nt of others. In a word, by taking all of the aforementioned reasons into considerati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2637.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 549.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80327868852 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83871001066 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 824.4 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1087894392 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.423076923 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1153846154 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.03846153846 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120333723871 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331639759571 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316670313304 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08006640977 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129833125498 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes. We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.