Sometimes universities get a funding from the government, and how to use the money becomes a controversial question. Some people advocate using the money to build new infrastructure and physical plant. Others think it is better to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied. Personally, I prefer the first answer because it is of benefit to all the members in the university. I feel this way for the following reasons.
To begin with, the most important goal for a university is to educate great students. For this reason, I think students is the first group of people should be satisfied in the university. Good infrastructure such as a library or high-end lab equipment satisfies intelligent students' thirst of knowledge and make students endeavor to study into a specific field. The job market is competitive, so students will like to learn as many skills as possible at school. By doing so, they are prone to find a better job. If a student have a better job and earn a lot of money, he/she may donate money to back to the school to build more infrastructure. Therefore, the university benefits. It becomes a positive cycle between students and schools.
Moreover, best infracture attracts best students. And since the most intelligent students are in the school, they help publish high quality of paper. The more intelligent students in a university the better the ranking of a school is. In the end, more and more studenets would like to apply to the university, and then the university can not only get more tuition from students but also wins more funding from the government. The more the money is, the better the infrastructure is. So, it is again a positive cycle between students and schools.
In addition, not only schools and students benefit but also faculties. why does a professor decide to spend his whole life in school rather than working as an expert in the best company of a country? I think that is because the most satisfaction for a professor is having an opportunity to discuss with brilliant students and watch them grow. Take my professor and me for example, we have been discussing a practical problem for all night and finally coming out a pattern when I studied in graduate school. After that discussion, we both felt satisfied and full of joys. What's more, the faculty in the university can use the infrastructure, too. As a result, the welfare of the faculty is also satisfied. Take my professor for example, thanks to him, his daughter can go inside the new library and study inside. And he is happy because he does not have to worry that his daughter may lie about hanging out all night with friends instead of studying. Therefore, it is not only a win-win, schools and students, investment but a win-win-win investment, schools, students, and faculties.
In conclusion, to be benifit of all the members in a university, I think it is more important for universities to invest in infracture and physical plant rather than to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'attracts the best'.
Suggestion: attracts the best
...and schools. Moreover, best infracture attracts best students. And since the most intelligen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Why
...nd students benefit but also faculties. why does a professor decide to spend his wh...
^^^
Line 4, column 571, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...e both felt satisfied and full of joys. Whats more, the faculty in the university can...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, i feel, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2490.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86328125 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88656545601 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45703125 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 780.3 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6933253779 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 11.8709677419 202% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276672471624 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691441476273 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965141072342 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206950001607 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149098705621 0.0645574589148 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.