In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
There is no shortage of opinion on number of people using cars are burgeoning along with the technological advancement. In the given scenario, it is said that whether the car usage will plummet within the next twenty years. Meanwhile, I am of the opinion that undoubtedly there will be more cars in near future. I feel this way for several reasons which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To start with, nowadays with the industrialization of current world people are becoming independent and they do not need to rely on others for anything. To be more precise, since they are employed and have to travel on daily basis they prefer to have their own vehicle. Drawing from my own experience, when I in high school I used to travel by public bus however as time passes I employed in an office then I upgraded myself to scooter and slowly with the increment in my salary now I travel to my work in car. Therefore, in the upcoming future, people are suceptible to have more cars since their living capacity is high and they acquire a comfortable life.
Next, advent of technology allows cars company to manufacture cars in a cost effective way. To be more clear, cars now have become quiet inexpensive as compared to earlier times. . Not only this, these days we can buy car in installment as well but this was not the case before. To cite an example, if we are eager to buy car but do not have sufficient fund nevertheless, we can have our own vehicle. In addition, we do not have to worry about the full payment. Many company have the facility of paying in installment has made our life more convenient. Hence, technology plays a pivol role in increment of car and in forth coming future, there will be definitely high of number of people using car.
To sum up, modernization has made possible to live a life comfortably in many aspects but especially in transportation sector. The use of car is always welcoming and when it comes to our future generation, there is no doubt that the usage will be expand rather than shrink.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... car. Therefore, in the upcoming future, people are suceptible to have more cars ...
^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...expensive as compared to earlier times. . Not only this, these days we can buy ca...
^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun company seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many companies'.
Suggestion: Many companies
...t have to worry about the full payment. Many company have the facility of paying in installm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ry about the full payment. Many company have the facility of paying in installment h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a pivol role in increment of car and in forth coming future, there will be defin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, while, i feel, in addition, no doubt, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63085399449 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7198343318 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534435261708 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.951614334 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8823529412 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221338000491 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751137274725 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523540729467 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142948770501 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377898701195 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.