A university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students. It can either improve the quality of the technology (for example computers and printers) that it provides for students. Or it can redesign spaces where students hold club meetings and gather with friends in their spare time to make these areas more comfortable and appealing. Which idea do you prefer and why?
There are some moot points about the money which universities invest in improving students facilities. The question of which activity is more important has aroused as the subject of controversy among academicians. Everyone has their own zeitgeist. When it comes to my position I strongly subscribe to the point that ameliorates technology such as computers and printers is more significant. I have some reasons two of which will be explicated hereunder.
The first reason worth discussing is that nowadays, one of the most important facilities in universities and schools are computers. Without these apparatus learning ability is students decrease dramatically. Consequently, up to date technologies boost students learning and lead to good corollary. Hence, universities should invest in these instruments because these technologies fortify ranked between other universities and give rise to more budget for them. As a case to the point I vividly remember when I was a student, there was a competition between universities in our town about computer programming. Although we had good students in this field, due to lacking up to date facilities we could not gain any prize in that competition. My personal example competently corroborates to the point that investment in technologies is very important for universities and lead to success.
By the same token, another reason to be mentioned here is that scientist asserts that technology facilities such as computers and video conference play a pivotal role to instruct students. They believe that former ways for learning the students had many negative aspects and decrease their learning ability. Scholar suggests to teachers and professors to instruct with new methods. For instance one of the most important apparatus is a video conference which provides a good base for learning. My personal experience demonstrates this reality when I was students I had some difficulties in mathematics thus, my father enrolled me in additional mathematics class. In that class, a teacher used a new method to learn math. He instructed with video conference and stated many examples of each chapter hence, my grade improved very well. My personal example shed some light to the point that new technologies are very momentous for students and give rise to high grades
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, expense money in up to dating technological facilities is more important of other activity. These facilities not only ameliorate students learning ability but also lead to fortify their average grades. And universities can kill two birds with one stone.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38686131387 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08497777455 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510948905109 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0308657979 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.636363636 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6818181818 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251327806813 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664655827385 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054370456938 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142347395085 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387115054736 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.