What is the most important factor that affect the lasting time of a friendship?
help each other at difficult time
have same interests
trust each other completely
Currently, living in fast-paced lives, there is an increasing number of individuals suffering from the insurmountable pressure generated from the excessive workload, therefore they are attaching more importance to their friendship, which they can resort to and attain more comfort to rejuvenate themselves. A bunch of individuals reckon that common interests are their pivotal factor influencing their lasting time of friendship. On the contrary, some other citizens harbor the idea that it is the trust between friends that enables them to sustain their friendships in the long run. Personally speaking, I cannot concur with the listed two opinions. I suggest that the bits of help rendered by my buddies are the most significant factors determining my lasting time of friendships and my opinion can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, helping with each other in perplexity renders friends an opportunity to reinforce friendships. As the old saying goes, a friend in need is a friend in deed. It is easy for friends to share happiness and joy with each other since those can be obtained without much efforts and endeavors, however, provided that during a friendship, I am confronted with innumerable difficulties that I fail to combat owing to my limited aptitude, my friends, regardless of my dilemma, disregard those problems enslaving me, it is inconceivable for me, who is taught to be altruistic to reach out my hands to those friends in need, to maintain the friendship with selfish or egotistical friends. For instance, in my relationship with my best friend, Rebecca, every time I encounter any kind of troubles, she is always ardent to offer me some suggestions from her standpoints before I seek help attentively. In return, I also spare no efforts to reach out my hands, not only helping her figure out the optimal approaches to tackle problems but also collaborating with her to put these methods into practice. On the basis of mutual help, we still maintain our friendship even though we are separated in different universities that are thousands of kilometers away from each other and different departments in totally disparate domains.
Furthermore, the experience of grappling with difficulties together also affords friends benefits to enhance their relationship. For one thing, the experience is worthy of cherishing since, during the period, not only my friends but also me accumulate priceless experience that is conducive to our future development. For another, it also renders us chances to repair our friendships. It is widely acknowledged that as individuals, the divergence is unavoidable, therefore the friendship is likely to cease or on the brink of collapse. Whereas, every time we are reminded of the memorable and tough time we share with each other, we reminisce about our devotion toward the friendship, thus forgiving each other. The research conducted by the Beijing Youth to evaluate citizens preferred approach to repair their friendship illuminates that 78% citizens tend to recall their memory they share with their friends, which reminds them of their friends’ merits, hence, they are more willing to admit their friends’ flaws. This research indicates that the tough time we spend with our friends not only enables us to amass experience beneficial for our future growth but also ensures that our friendship is long-lasting.
Admittedly, the same interests also constitute a stepping stone in establishing a friendship, nevertheless, living in a constantly changing society, individuals’ interests, affected by the newly-emerging affairs, can also be altered frequently. Therefore, those friendship based on common interests is vulnerable to the constant changing. Apart from that, we ought to admit that trust is also a determinant factor in deciding the lasting time of our friendship, but the trust cannot be erected without any solid foundation, without the experience about offering hands to friends in dilemma.
In a nutshell, from what has been discussed above, the most important factor affecting our lasting time of friendships is helping each other at a difficult time since for one thing, helping each other is conducive for us to lay a solid foundation of friendships of trust which extends the lasting time of friendship. For another, compared with the ever-changing interests, helping each other enables us to maintain the stability of friendships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...happiness and joy with each other since those can be obtained without much efforts and en...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...her since those can be obtained without much efforts and endeavors, however, provide...
^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this friendship' or 'those friendships'?
Suggestion: this friendship; those friendships
... also be altered frequently. Therefore, those friendship based on common interests is vulnerable...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, apart from, for instance, kind of, for one thing, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 88.0 43.0788530466 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 112.0 52.1666666667 215% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3738.0 1977.66487455 189% => OK
No of words: 697.0 407.700716846 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36298421808 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.13816675137 4.48103885553 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10141385011 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 327.0 212.727598566 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469153515065 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1133.1 618.680645161 183% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.376432041 48.9658058833 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.52173913 100.406767564 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3043478261 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.60869565217 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284699559601 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872618673916 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114119278904 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20030218537 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152396043891 0.0645574589148 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 184.0 86.8835125448 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.