Which kind of professors will you choose when selecting the courses?
1. Some professors who are voted to be the most popular one.
2. Some professors who are rewarded of outstanding research.
Unlike the past when students were always required to learn in accordance with teachers’ guidance, nowadays people are given more chances to embed critical thinking while studying, even choose professors when being encountered with multiple selection of courses. Some prefer to the professors who are voted the most popular ones, while on the contrary, others hold the view that professors who are rewarded of outstanding research are more favorable. From my perspective, I stand on the latter, it is of greater significance to have better academic rewards than being popular among students.
To begin with, being rewarded of outstanding research indicates that the person is highly authorized in academic circle. Provided that students choose the course taught by this professor, they are more likely to have opportunities to get access to the most updated scientific achievements in the related field, which is definitely vital in the rapid-developing society. They could utilize the attainments to develop their own research in the area, which must undoubtedly contribute to their further studies and future career. For instance, my neighbor Jie, who is currently studying software engineering in college, has completed a research related to artificial intelligence, which was led by her tutor. During the time, she got a lot of practice and became more capable in dealing with real-life problems, apart from what she could learn from the class. It is inevitable that this experience would make her resume more competitive and give her better chance to enter a bigger enterprise.
Additionally, being rewarded of great research means that the professor would tend to have more funding from the university as well as organizations. The students would be beneficial for the fact that their learning environment could be improved. For example, they could use the most high-tech equipment to conduct experiment. Once the hardware and software have been enhanced, more talented students would be attracted to enter this class, which could reinforce the quality of the course. The class discussion could be more inspired and the students would be more motivated to learn. There has been a survey conducted to analyze students’ willingness of participating in different seminars and the results suggested that students took a more active part in the discussion which had a greater number of gifted group members involved.
To be honest, choosing the professors who are voted to be the most popular ones may also have some merits. Because they are favored by students, it is more likely that their class would be more interesting. However, sometimes this would mean the class efficiency may be lowered for the students may be more focused on playing. Besides, the students may pay more attention to the professor instead of the content of the class.
To conclude, choosing the professors who won the reward of research has more pros. Firstly, it may help the students gain more competency in further studies and career. Secondly, the learning environment would be better and students would have chances to meet more excellent classmates.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, of course, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2663.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3689516129 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08877745125 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491935483871 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 818.1 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6475748594 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.045454545 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22727272727 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298239919177 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107418868073 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134121227164 0.0737576698707 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202042514921 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100756524847 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.