In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rapidly, large cracks appear in the bark, and the trees die. A spread of P. ramorum represents a serious threat to the forests in the western states. Several methods of protecting the forests have been proposed.
The reading states that the microscopic fungus known as Phytophthora Ramoroum infected the forests of the western United States and presents several procedures of protecting and conservation of these forests and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that unfortunately these methods has a serious faults, and not only seems it to be impractical, but has not it huge impact such forests.
First, the reading state that preventing from spreading these fungus spores by means of impede human-assisted spread spores by way of shoes and bicycle tires and appreciated to wash their shoes. the professor opposes this point by stating that in the rainy day, water from rain washes all path and rout from spores, these spores could have spread by rain wash, these human effect is trivial.
Second, the article states that use of fungicidal might have been a useful and advantage to protect tree from disease. However, the professor contends that spread of this fungicidal directly on trunk might have worked in small-scale such as a park; nonetheless, the prodigious size of forest, and expansiveness of these areas may be not a good idea; in addition, it has a costly expenditure.
Third, the reading avers that the approaches accomplish with cutting and burning the disease trees, but it also contains cutting and burning the virtually healthy oaks. the professor opposes this point by declaring that some trees such as oaks play a vital role in earth environmental and are rare restoration and coming back of these species are an arduous effort; Hence It is costly and a great ecological damage to forests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'fault'?
Suggestion: fault
...fortunately these methods has a serious faults, and not only seems it to be impractica...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...es and appreciated to wash their shoes. the professor opposes this point by stating...
^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...and burning the virtually healthy oaks. the professor opposes this point by declari...
^^^
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great ecological damage'.
Suggestion: great ecological damage
... arduous effort; Hence It is costly and a great ecological damage to forests.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, may, nonetheless, second, so, third, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16541353383 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72150332733 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.264591747 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.75 110.228320801 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.25 21.698381199 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.375 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125652488839 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546114839275 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606884537825 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757685573612 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509893292782 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.3589403974 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.