cedar trees
Although both of passage and lecture discusse about decline ih the population of cedar trees, lecturer casts doubt on which is written in the article. The passage described tree reason for this declination of cedar trees. However, the professor argued these reasons.
At the first, in the passage mentions to the insects, especially cedar bark beetle, as a cause of declining of the cedar trees. Yet the lecturer states that these trees not only are resistance enough to these insects, but also, in fact, are much more resistance compared to the other tree species in face these insects.
Second, in the passage brown bears is proposed to account of decreasing of cedar trees. The professor, however, disagrees with this idea. The passage sates that clawing of the bears results in being weak tress. The professor explains that there are somewhere that there is not brown bear there, but cedar polulation is declining. Therefor, this idea that brown bear could be an reason for decreasing the cedar trees is a unreasonable idea.
Third, in the article climate change is mentioned as an another reason for this changes in the cedar polulation. the lecturer, however, casts doubt on this idea by explanation about decline of cedar treea in different areas with different temperature. He belived that some of these trees was able to grow in the low temperature regions. So the idea of effect of climate in the cedar tree polulation could not a fundamental reason for this change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ugh both of passage and lecture discusse about decline ih the population of cedar...
^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tance compared to the other tree species in face these insects. Second, in the...
^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the bears results in being weak tress. The professor explains that there are somew...
^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...for, this idea that brown bear could be an reason for decreasing the cedar trees i...
^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eason for decreasing the cedar trees is a unreasonable idea. Third, in the arti...
^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a reason' or 'another reason'.
Suggestion: a reason; another reason
... article climate change is mentioned as an another reason for this changes in the cedar polulatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e is mentioned as an another reason for this changes in the cedar polulation. the le...
^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...r this changes in the cedar polulation. the lecturer, however, casts doubt on this ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04048582996 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55128838667 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497975708502 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1329497368 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9285714286 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389625785458 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141751231401 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10451257197 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261981288009 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303828025007 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.