The reading and lecture are both discuss about the pros and cons of online and traditional encyclopedias. The passage conveys that online source of encyclopedia pose numerous problems and less reliable compared to the text. The lecturer casts doubt on this idea of the author by several points that are contrary claiming that traditional form is subjected to more errors.
Firstly, the lecturer states that mistakes made in the book form cannot be erased easily and will remain unchanged for decades. Accordingly, she explains that it can be inaccurate. However, the author claims that online articles can be written by any personal who may be lacking credentials as such can produce inaccurate publication while text is written by trained expert. The lecture casts doubt on this by claiming that online errors can be edited and rectified easily.
Secondly, all the reliable facts are stored in the read only format which cannot be altered in online version. Likewise,there are special editors available who monitors the false information and reports only the accurate ones in the web. In the reading it is asserted that there are more chances of fabricated and corrupted news to be reported in communal online encyclopedia than the printed version. This is being challenged by lecturer stating that they are released in the protected form.
Finally, the text can only publish limited materials in contrast the online version has plenty of space which allows a diverse range of information for the users. However, the passage contents that online encyclopedia takes too much emphasis on the popular and insignificant matters. This is opposed in the audio by saying that information is not limited to users but a variety of topics related is available according to their needs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...and less reliable compared to the text. The lecturer casts doubt on this idea of th...
^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...t be altered in online version. Likewise,there are special editors available who monit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19444444444 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70458251668 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3728060524 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213776494847 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755699125935 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531117819497 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12883124094 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035354945968 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.