The critics about the accuracy of the memoirs of the book of Chevalier de Seingalt
The passage and the lecture are both about the accuracy of the memoirs that Chevalier de Seingalt wrote about his life and adventures. The lecture gives three reasons because critics has raised doubts about their veracity, instead the professor in the lecture gives arguments which imply that what Chevalier wrote are true, or at least the arguments of the critics are not absolute.
So, the first doubt of the critics is why Chevalier had to borrow money from a Swiss merchant, if it is true that he was very wealthy? They say this has no logic. But the professor in the lecture says that this can be possible, because there are some cases when he sold the home and were waiting for money that was necessary for him to lawn until he got paid.
The second argument the critics are skeptical, is the accuracy of the conversation between him and Voltaire. They do not doubt about their relationship, but for them it's impossible to remember every single conversation. But the professor in the lecture says that it is possible, because there are evidences that Chevalier used to take notes every night after those conversations, notes that he then used when he wrote the book.
The third reason the critics use to doubt about the veracity of the stories Chevalier wrote in his book, is why he did not escape from the prison asking his friend from Venice to help, but he had to use a piece of metal to make a hole in the ceiling of the room of the prison. Instead, the professor claims that after Chevalier was gone, they had to repair the ceiling of the room. Why would it be necessary if it wasn't like he wrote?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...e book. The third reason the critics use to doubt about the veracity of the stor...
^^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...e room. Why would it be necessary if it wasnt like he wrote?
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, third, at least, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57931034483 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37085955504 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5288229784 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.727272727 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274548842845 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103586490136 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124901793968 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168921904516 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116394317299 0.0443174109184 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.42419426049 82% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.