DInosaurs are endotherms.
The lecture discusses that the dinosaurs are not endotherms. To support this the professor had provides three different evidences about the dinosaurs, these evidences have directly contradicted the points stated in the passage that the dinosaurs are endotherms.
Firstly, the lecture said that even though the fossils are found in polar regions, when the temperature is high in polar regions the endotherm can't live there and when the temperature is cold enough the dinosaurs migrate to other regions. This opposes the ideas in the passage which says that the animals who keep up the temperature of their body can live in a cold climate.
Secondly, the lecture showed that the legs that are beneath the body of dinosaurs are to support the weight of the dinosaurs, and because of this place of legs they can grow to a large size. On the other hand, the passage stated that the animal whose legs are beneath the body has a function of running.
Thirdly, according to the lecture, the bone structure of the dinosaurs has growth rings that are responsible for the growth of the dinosaurs, also the growth rings are evidence that during the cooler period the growth of the dinosaurs is stopped or is slow down. Therefore, the characteristic that the growth increases and then slow down and again increases rapidly is not the characteristics of the endotherm. However, the passage said that because the bone structure of dinosaurs has Haversian Canals the dinosaurs grow quickly.
Thus we can conclude that although the passage says that dinosaurs are endotherm on the basis of three evidences, the lecture shows how it has opposite evidence against that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... is high in polar regions the endotherm cant live there and when the temperature is ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...anals the dinosaurs grow quickly. Thus we can conclude that although the passa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07636363636 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63056666742 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1602097658 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.6 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297080158819 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143026138958 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166414904665 0.0662205650399 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157603538154 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125978152282 0.0443174109184 284% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.