As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high Archaeologist

Essay topics:

As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high. Archaeologists have been trying to determine how the buildings were used. While there is still no universally agreed upon explanation, there are three competing theories.

The article states that the applications of the buildings of settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico have several explanations, but is no universally verified by scientists, and provides three reasons for supports. However, the professor explains that unfortunately, none of these explanation are convincing and refutes each the author's reasons.

First, the reading states that applications of these houses are similar to the new modern apartments in the New Mexico, these similarity may be due to the structure of these houses. The professor refutes this points by stating that the out side design and structure of these house are similar to new one. nonetheless, the interior design cast serious doubt upon the living people into these houses, the absence of fire-place and cooking material for numerous people give a firm conclusion about none-living structure there.

Second, the article claims that the houses used to store grains and other material in order to supply needs of residence. However, the professor contends that the theory mentioned in passage is unsupported by evidence. by excavating the floor of houses, scientists did not find trace of grians such as maze and containers.

Third, the reading avers that the structure were used as ceremonial center. the professor opposes this point by declaring that other substance were found near the broken pots that supported idea in which the construction labor's meals plot and the construction material hip leads a result thereby using not to residential purpose.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this explanation' or 'these explanations'?
Suggestion: this explanation; these explanations
...or explains that unfortunately, none of these explanation are convincing and refutes each the aut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this similarity' or 'these similarities'?
Suggestion: this similarity; these similarities
...ew modern apartments in the New Mexico, these similarity may be due to the structure of these ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: OUT_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outside'?
Suggestion: outside
...refutes this points by stating that the out side design and structure of these house are...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nonetheless
... of these house are similar to new one. nonetheless, the interior design cast serious doubt...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
... in passage is unsupported by evidence. by excavating the floor of houses, scienti...
^^
Line 10, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ners. Third, the reading avers that the structure were used as ceremonial ce...
^^
Line 10, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ructure were used as ceremonial center. the professor opposes this point by declari...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, third, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40248962656 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81600621702 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585062240664 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5763840476 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.2 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111763956966 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419004647865 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562823993104 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065913164518 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519326378271 0.0443174109184 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.