ETS book about the professors appearance on TV to show academic research

Essay topics:

ETS book about the professors appearance on TV to show academic research

The lecture and the reading both discuss the appearance of the professors on the TV to present academic material. While the reading states that this is a beneficial process to professors themselves, the university, and the general public. The lecture refutes this, saying that it is not good for all sides.
First of all, the reading claims that this helps the professors to acquire reputation and appreciation from the audience like scholars. However, the lecture argues that the reputation will be to some sides for entertainment purposes rather than educational, also this will be difficult for professors to get money for doing this research.
In addition, the reading makes an argument that the university will receive positive publicity so that people will think this university highly than others, also the reputation will enhance the donation process and increase the applications from students. The lecture counters this point by stating the interview will take much time from professors in focusing on the material to present, also maybe it needs traveling, and to look good on the screen, so they can spend that time on doing research.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that viewer will have a chance to learn from academic stuff and experts, and to get a taste of real experts. The reading also states that TV is commentary and good medium to that information. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that TV does not want a series depth information, also the material that the professors will present just a background , that is not different from any reporter on the screen, so the public will not be benefited much.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ors themselves, the university, and the general public. The lecture refutes this, saying that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 392, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rofessors will present just a background , that is not different from any reporter...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, look, may, so, while, in addition, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05904059041 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68088830224 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490774907749 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.853540214 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.1 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123982206651 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06617185872 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717242409517 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907516218898 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461807170065 0.0443174109184 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.