According to the reading passage, numerous birds are injured every year while trying to fly through glass windows used in modern buildings. The author presents some solutions that can be applied to prevent injuries to birds. However, the lecturer finds this ideas dubious and dismisses them all by providing counter-arguments.
First of all, the reading proposes to replace regular clear glass with glasses that are transparent in only one direction. The author explains that it would help birds to understand the presence of glass as they fail to see through window from outside the building. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this idea and points out to the fact that as this kind of one-way glass reflects like mirror birds would be confused by reflection of sky or trees on the glass. Therefore, birds would consider the reflection of trees or sky and fly right way which could be dangerous for them.
Secondly, the author depicts the idea of using colorful designs on regular window glass. The author also explains that using thin stripes painted over glass would allow people to see through the openings in the design while allowing birds to avoid trying to fly through as they could see the strips. By contrast, the speaker argues that birds might try to fly through the openings if they mistakenly consider the openings as open holes. Therefore, to discourage them flying through, openings need to be tiny which consequently make the room too dark for people inside.
Finally, the author brings up the idea of using fake magnetic field to guide birds in a direction away from buildings. According to the passage, birds have a natural ability to sense magnetic fields which helps them to navigate in right direction. Thus, building equipped with electromagnets can be used to emit signals which hinders bird to fly towards that building. On contrast, the professor explains that birds only used its magnetic field wen they travel long distance. To travel from one side of city to other side, it only use it's eyes and brightness of light. Therefore, using magnetic field would be futile in this case.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s to birds. However, the lecturer finds this ideas dubious and dismisses them all by...
^^^^
Line 7, column 532, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'uses'?
Suggestion: uses
...one side of city to other side, it only use its eyes and brightness of light. There...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 30.3222958057 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 355.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97746478873 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47856912347 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501408450704 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6186746844 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.941176471 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273217195935 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915368797412 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076702811947 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180469076477 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816895479498 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.