Integrated
The reading passage and the lecture are both about the population decrease of sea otters. The author of the article mentions two potential causes for such decline.
First assumption made in the text is that the major and more likely cause of the phenomenon is the environmental pollution, while the second culprit might be the attacks by the predator. However, the professor casts doubts on the first claim of the text by considering the orcas as a more highly potential danger for the population of the sea mammals. He asserts that there are not many dead otters found on the shores which proves that they were not killed as a result of environmental factors but were simply eaten by the predators. Moreover, he posits, that the whales, being the main source of food for orcas are becoming fewer because of human hunters. Therefore, the orcas change their diet to an easier findable food such as sea otters.
According to the paragraph the uneven distribution of the animals can be explained by the ocean currents which lead to an unequal pollution over the habitat of otters. However, the professor successfully rebuts this argument by putting forth the idea that that the sea otter population is stable in the rocky areas which are not accessible by the carnivores.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'unequal pollution'.
Suggestion: unequal pollution
...ned by the ocean currents which lead to an unequal pollution over the habitat of otters. However, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...this argument by putting forth the idea that that the sea otter population is stable in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9212962963 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59192699789 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8745851798 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.