Integrated essay drowsing technology

Essay topics:

Integrated essay

drowsing technology.

The reading text and lecture are both about the drowsing technology. The author of this article feels that, this technology is very effective to find the underground water. The lecturer is cast doubt on the two point made by the author. He says that all this techonology is false it has no any scintific evidence.

Firstly, according to the reading text, this technology is well known for finding the undergound water. The author suggests that, the drowser is uses special tool to feel the frequancy of underground water.The lecturer is asserts all this claim and states that, scientist has the device, which can track the radioactive waves coming from the another planet. but, this system is failed to sense the underground waves. Additionally, he point our that, drowsing technology is work without any fundamental scientific foundation.

finally, The reading passage posits that, drowsing is getting popularity in this days. The author also mention that, many official institution is gives funding to this type of activity. In contrast, the lecturer is stance that, Under strict scientific observation drowser is fail to find the underground water, by using drowsing tool. On top of that, he note out that this technology is just the luck of the drowser.

In conclusion, although the reading text and lecture are both about the drowsing technology. The lecturer is effectively challnged all the two point made by the author in this article.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ffective to find the underground water. The lecturer is cast doubt on the two point...
^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...at all this techonology is false it has no any scintific evidence. Firstly, acc...
^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...feel the frequancy of underground water.The lecturer is asserts all this claim and ...
^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...e waves coming from the another planet. but, this system is failed to sense the und...
^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'points'.
Suggestion: points
...the underground waves. Additionally, he point our that, drowsing technology is work w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...y fundamental scientific foundation. finally, The reading passage posits that, drows...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...that, drowsing is getting popularity in this days. The author also mention that, man...
^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'notes'.
Suggestion: notes
...using drowsing tool. On top of that, he note out that this technology is just the lu...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1914893617 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7202242072 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523404255319 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1827212407 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1428571429 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7857142857 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121245685464 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545927599271 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522948243362 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881265973656 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178372170003 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.