integrated topic
Both the reading and the lecture discuss several methods which are used to solve the problem of declining of frog population. In the reading section, the writer contends that these solutions are highly beneficial and can lead to stop reducing frog populations and provides three reasons to support; however, in the lecture, the professor casts doubts on reading points by indicating that none of the methods is practical.
First of all, the writer claims it is need to intact some laws in order to prohibit the farmers from using pesticides which are harmful for frogs; in contrast, the professor rejects this notion by stating that it is not economical because if the farmers follow restriction rules, they will lose their crops and it makes competitive situation between farmers.
Moreover, the reading passage holds the view that it can be beneficial to treat or prevent infection which causes dehydration by antifungal medication; on the contrary, the lecturer underlines the fact that this method has two problems. First, it is difficult to apply this treatment on all the frogs, and also fungus will pass to offspring and new generation will have this problem too so it is not cost effective.
In addition, the writer mentions that since frogs lay their eggs in water, they should protect natural habitats such as lakes and marshes from human activities; conversely, the professor indicates that the biggest problem for natural habitat is global warming and it is less likely to prevent this phenomenon.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233333333333 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.185185185185 0.158904122519 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0777777777778 0.0723426182421 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0407407407407 0.0435111971325 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0407407407407 0.0277247811725 147% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114814814815 0.128828473217 89% => OK
Participles: 0.037037037037 0.0370669169778 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61455721987 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0333333333333 0.0208969081088 160% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.107407407407 0.128158765124 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0222222222222 0.0158828679856 140% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0148148148148 0.0114777025283 129% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1513.0 1645.83664459 92% => OK
No of words: 247.0 271.125827815 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12550607287 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.396761133603 0.374372842146 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.311740890688 0.287516216867 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19028340081 0.187439937562 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.141700404858 0.113142543107 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61455721987 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611336032389 0.539623497131 113% => OK
Word variations: 64.3956377776 53.8517498576 120% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 41.1666666667 21.7502111507 189% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 79.4930115726 49.3711431718 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 252.166666667 132.220823453 191% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 41.1666666667 21.7502111507 189% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.0 0.878197800319 228% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 72.3407557355 50.5018328374 143% => OK
Elegance: 1.44444444444 1.90840788429 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.209787018418 0.142949733639 147% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.077530519263 0.0787303798458 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.845169897665 0.631733273073 134% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13069111744 0.139662658121 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.342981477584 0.414875509568 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0288173303262 0.0530846634433 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.