Jane Austen portrait
The provided material are concerned with jane austen who was a famous English novelist and except a sketch made by her sister cassandra, there was not any acceptable image of her. The author states that a full-length portrait of a teenage girl which recently published belongs to jane austen. In contrast, the lecturer repudiates this point through several counterarguments that are as follows.
Initially, the author says that her family recognized this portrait as a portrait of the prominent novelist and gave permission to use the portrait as an illustration of austen's letters. However, the lecturer explains that the portrait has been published several decades after the austen death and probably her family who recognize the portrait have never seen the novelist.
Second, the writer thinks that the portrait is similar to the sketch that cassandra had made from young austen. Yet again, the speaker underscores that it is viable that the girl in the portrait could be one of her relatives who resembles her. Actually, there was a girl in her extended family who named Mary and the evidence show that she really took after jane austen.
The final contention between the article and lecture is the portrait style. The author says that the portrait style is similar to Ozias Humphrey's works who was active in the late 1780s and early 1790s. On the other hand, the speaker explains that style is not the only factor that makes known the portrait painter. evidence shows that the portrait painted later by William Leg who apparently did not see the canvas until his 20s and in that time austen was older than the girl in the portrait.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 316, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Evidence
... that makes known the portrait painter. evidence shows that the portrait painted later b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, however, really, second, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98913043478 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48575811047 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528985507246 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1435217801 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452009413379 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172634059297 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100812837936 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29132970981 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299392358559 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.