In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages.
The article states that when a project is held by a group of workers instead of individuals, it would be carried easier. The author provides three reasons to support. However, the professor explains that an experience in a factory has shown something against this view. He refutes each of the writer's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that while every members of a group has a specific knowledge and skill, the sum of these will gain more profits. The professor refutes this point by saying that the thing that had happened in the mentioned project was opposite of this. He states that as some members were not as responsible as others, they did not do any actions and they became thoroughly "free ride". They did not contribute with other members. But unfortunately, the project was recognized by the whole team not its members and this issue upset the active members.
Secondly, the article posits that group working will implement the projects faster. However, the professor says that this matter is not true due to the existence of several ideas in the group. According to the professor, each group member has an individual view and wants to describe it. This issue will take a long time and increase the time of doing the project.
Third, the reading says that working in a team can prosper the workers' talents and they can talk about their views easier. The professor opposes this point by explaining that this has a negative effect on the members. We also learn that when one or two members are more influential than others, they try to conceive others to do the process with their view. But, this matter has reverse effect when the project become failed because the responsibility of the projects is on the shoulders of all members.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84437086093 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49435351995 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529801324503 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3801262299 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0588235294 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117200282113 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040447379427 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415116599394 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779563832947 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226967430612 0.0443174109184 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.